Closed sgt101 closed 4 years ago
Given that is just a prior and we have distribution around it all plausible values that data wants is available. It is not a fixed value but a normal centered at 3.28 with sigma as kappa so we have big variations around it covered.
Just to add, mu is the parameter for R0, not the time varying reproduction number R(t).
On Mon, 11 May 2020, 19:44 Swapnil Mishra, notifications@github.com wrote:
Closed #102 https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/covid19model/issues/102.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/covid19model/issues/102#event-3324281100, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAOPW7BSHVJCTDY522FCRTRRBBPPANCNFSM4M6EPU7A .
Hello,
am I correct that the mu value in base.stan is the R0 infection rate?
I looked at the reference in the code - to Lui et-al 2020 ISTM paper. The mean of the estimates is 3.28; why was that chosen rather than the median, and why were the outliers not excluded?