Closed davidorme closed 4 months ago
Attention: 21 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
177abd5
) 78.11% compared to head (80dfec4
) 79.06%.
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
safedata_validator/taxondb.py | 64.81% | 19 Missing :warning: |
safedata_validator/entry_points.py | 92.85% | 2 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Note that the new tests do actually call on remote resources (GBIF and NCBI) but only for small payloads to validate timestamps. This links into #57, so that when this gets tackled, these tests should also be mockable.
This PR fixes #106
taxondb
functions are broken up a bit to separate the timestamp validation into standalone functions that are now tested.