Open RobertSpang opened 9 months ago
We find that new fields are needed to cover RSL information, but most likely no master data. We believe only the first line could be translated 1 to 1 into a new field. All other elements should be free text.
General: The declaration of an RSL is mandatory, if all B-modules are declared. Because without all B-modules, the use conditions are not properly defined.
Service Life (Reference Service Life (RSL) or Estimated Service Life (ESL)) mandatory if use stage is declared, only one needs to be selected
Declaration of the source; only 3 valid options:
Declaration of the products service life acc. EN 15804+A2 chapter 7.3.3.2 RSL. The RSL shall be established in accordance with any specific rules given in European product standards or, if not available, a c-PCR, and shall take into account ISO 15686-1, -2, -7 and -8. Where European product standards or a c-PCR provide guidance on deriving the RSL, such guidance shall have priority. The sources have to be indicated.
integer number
contextually mandatory, single occurrence
years; fixed
Service life in years
Service life describes the lifespan of the product.
The value may be estimated by a manufacturer or calculated according to a standard, which then needs to be referenced.
Optional
1
No field needed: This can be done via existence and/or compliance of the reference to some standard. It's RSL if
example markup:
<serviceLife>
<years>50</years>
<useConditions factor="A - inherent quality" degree="1"/>
<useConditions factor="B - design level" degree="2"/>
<useConditions factor="C - work execution" degree="1"/>
<useConditions factor="D - indoor environment" degree="1"/>
<useConditions factor="E - outdoor environment" degree="4"/>
<useConditions factor="F - usage conditions" degree="3"/>
<useConditions factor="G - maintenance level" degree="5"/>
<referenceToStandard type="source data set" refObjectId="c0016b33-8cf7-415c-ac6e-deba0d21440d" version="00.01.000">
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="en">EN15804+A2</common:shortDescription>
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="de">EN15804+A2</common:shortDescription>
</referenceToStandard>
<referenceToUseConditionsDocumentation type="source data set" refObjectId="aaaaaaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa" version="00.01.000">
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="en">wood panel use conditions and service life</common:shortDescription>
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="de">Einbaubedingungen und Lebensdauer von Holzplatten</common:shortDescription>
</referenceToUseConditionsDocumentation>
<comment xml:lang="en">The indicated service life requires installation and maintenance according to manufacturer instructions.</comment>
<comment xml:lang="de">Die angegebene Lebensdauer setzt eine Installation und Wartung gemäß den Anweisungen des Herstellers voraus.</comment>
</serviceLife>
Our understanding of this is insufficient for implementation.
We've been deep diving into the standards and from what we understand, the dataset needs to declare an RSL and explain what assumptions have lead to the RSL value.
From the data format view point this suggests using text field for each of the factors. E.g.
<useCondition factor="E - outdoor environment">Lots of rain, but no wind.</useCondition>
Now,
referenceToUseConditionsDocumentation
). Does it need to be machine readable? As far as we can see is no standard to the text value, like e.g. a numerical value.My opinion is, that we implement that as textfield as proposed by you for now. Guess the whole topic will be subject to change and regulations/delegated acts/standrads in the future. Only then machine readable implementation would be possible.
My opinion is, that we implement that as textfield as proposed by you for now. Guess the whole topic will be subject to change and regulations/delegated acts/standrads in the future. Only then machine readable implementation would be possible.
Any reflections on the role of the "degree" value (0-5, n/a) here (question #3 above)?
@EmilieBrisson @szwerenz ?
Think this one is rather simple: as long as we have no legal framewortk around this, we cannot make it machine readable. So: we need one (1) new field, containing the RSL in years, and a free text field describing the boundary conditions. That´s it.
But if there is a RSL which all this text describes, why not add a field, where the RSL number can be? However, I do agree with the text setup and as no specefic law or rules are stated yet it is difficult to implement.
Summary and consensus from the discussion during this morning's meeting: We want to represent a table with factor category / object-specific grade / reference grade / factor / comment
rename "years" to "RSL"
add separate "ESL" value
useConditions allows additional optional multilang comment
rename @factor -> @factorCategory
rename @degree -> @referenceGrade
add attribute @objectSpecificGrade
make sure @degree allows N/A value (could be null
-> absent attribute)
add reference to ISO 15686-8 in the schema doc
<serviceLife>
<RSL>50</RSL>
<ESL>40</ESL>
<useConditions factorCategory="A - inherent quality" objectSpecificGrade="3" referenceGrade="1" factor="0.8">
<comment xml:lang="en">comment here</comment>
<comment xml:lang="de">Kommentar hier!</comment>
</useConditions>
<useConditions factorCategory="B - design level" objectSpecificGrade="3" referenceGrade="2" factor="0.9"/>
<useConditions factorCategory="C - work execution" objectSpecificGrade="3" referenceGrade="1" factor="0.8"/>
<useConditions factorCategory="D - indoor environment" objectSpecificGrade="3" referenceGrade="1" factor="0.8"/>
<useConditions factorCategory="E - outdoor environment" objectSpecificGrade="3" referenceGrade="4" factor="1.1"/>
<useConditions factorCategory="F - usage conditions" objectSpecificGrade="3" referenceGrade="3" factor="1.0"/>
<useConditions factorCategory="G - maintenance level" objectSpecificGrade="3" referenceGrade="5" factor="1.2"/>
<referenceToStandard type="source data set" refObjectId="c0016b33-8cf7-415c-ac6e-deba0d21440d" version="00.01.000">
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="en">EN15804+A2</common:shortDescription>
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="de">EN15804+A2</common:shortDescription>
</referenceToStandard>
<referenceToUseConditionsDocumentation type="source data set" refObjectId="aaaaaaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa" version="00.01.000">
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="en">wood panel use conditions and service life</common:shortDescription>
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="de">Einbaubedingungen und Lebensdauer von Holzplatten</common:shortDescription>
</referenceToUseConditionsDocumentation>
<comment xml:lang="en">The indicated service life requires installation and maintenance according to manufacturer instructions.</comment>
<comment xml:lang="de">Die angegebene Lebensdauer setzt eine Installation und Wartung gemäß den Anweisungen des Herstellers voraus.</comment>
</serviceLife>
Additionally, from my understanding:
Both RSL
and ESL
need to declare use conditions.
So let`s give both values all the means to declare use conditions, standards etc.
<referenceServiceLife epd24:years=100>
<useConditions factorCategory="A - inherent quality" objectSpecificGrade="3" referenceGrade="1" factor="0.8">
<comment xml:lang="en">comment here</comment>
<comment xml:lang="de">Kommentar hier!</comment>
</useConditions>
<useConditions factorCategory="B - design level" objectSpecificGrade="3" referenceGrade="2" factor="0.9"/>
<useConditions factorCategory="C - work execution" objectSpecificGrade="3" referenceGrade="1" factor="0.8"/>
<useConditions factorCategory="D - indoor environment" objectSpecificGrade="3" referenceGrade="1" factor="0.8"/>
<useConditions factorCategory="E - outdoor environment" objectSpecificGrade="3" referenceGrade="4" factor="1.1"/>
<useConditions factorCategory="F - usage conditions" objectSpecificGrade="3" referenceGrade="3" factor="1.0"/>
<useConditions factorCategory="G - maintenance level" objectSpecificGrade="3" referenceGrade="5" factor="1.2"/>
<referenceToStandard type="source data set" refObjectId="c0016b33-8cf7-415c-ac6e-deba0d21440d" version="00.01.000">
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="en">EN15804+A2</common:shortDescription>
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="de">EN15804+A2</common:shortDescription>
</referenceToStandard>
<referenceToUseConditionsDocumentation type="source data set" refObjectId="aaaaaaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa" version="00.01.000">
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="en">wood panel use conditions and service life</common:shortDescription>
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="de">Einbaubedingungen und Lebensdauer von Holzplatten</common:shortDescription>
</referenceToUseConditionsDocumentation>
<comment xml:lang="en">The indicated service life requires installation and maintenance according to manufacturer instructions.</comment>
<comment xml:lang="de">Die angegebene Lebensdauer setzt eine Installation und Wartung gemäß den Anweisungen des Herstellers voraus.</comment>
</referenceServiceLife>
<esimatedServiceLife epd24:years=8>
<useConditions factorCategory="A - inherent quality" objectSpecificGrade="5" referenceGrade="1" factor="0.7">
<comment xml:lang="en">comment here</comment>
<comment xml:lang="de">Kommentar hier!</comment>
</useConditions>
<useConditions factorCategory="B - design level" objectSpecificGrade="5" referenceGrade="2" factor="0.7"/>
<useConditions factorCategory="C - work execution" objectSpecificGrade="5" referenceGrade="1" factor="0.7"/>
<useConditions factorCategory="D - indoor environment" objectSpecificGrade="5" referenceGrade="1" factor="0.7"/>
<useConditions factorCategory="E - outdoor environment" objectSpecificGrade="5" referenceGrade="4" factor="0.7"/>
<useConditions factorCategory="F - usage conditions" objectSpecificGrade="5" referenceGrade="3" factor="0.7"/>
<useConditions factorCategory="G - maintenance level" objectSpecificGrade="1" referenceGrade="5" factor="0.7"/>
<referenceToStandard type="source data set" refObjectId="c0016b33-8cf7-415c-ac6e-deba0d21440d" version="00.01.000">
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="en">ISO22057</common:shortDescription>
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="de">ISO22057</common:shortDescription>
</referenceToStandard>
<referenceToUseConditionsDocumentation type="source data set" refObjectId="aaaaaaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa" version="00.01.000">
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="en">wood panel use conditions and service life</common:shortDescription>
<common:shortDescription xml:lang="de">Einbaubedingungen und Lebensdauer von Holzplatten</common:shortDescription>
</referenceToUseConditionsDocumentation>
<comment xml:lang="en">The indicated service life requires installation and maintenance according to manufacturer instructions.</comment>
<comment xml:lang="de">Die angegebene Lebensdauer setzt eine Installation und Wartung gemäß den Anweisungen des Herstellers voraus.</comment>
</estimatedServiceLife>
Implementation status:
I raise this change request because...
-- [ ] the ILCD+EPD format lacks compliance with regualtions. -- [X] the ILCD+EPD format lacks conformaty with standards. -- [ ] the ILCD+EPD format needs to be improved regarding existing format or master data elements. -- [ ] there is another problem or use case I´m trying to address.
Problem description
Solution description
New master datasets need to be created and possibly the format extended
Relevance or added value
High relevance