[ ] the ILCD+EPD format lacks compliance with regualtions.
[X] the ILCD+EPD format lacks conformaty with standards.
[ ] the ILCD+EPD format needs to be improved regarding existing format or master data elements.
[ ] there is another problem or use case I´m trying to address.
Problem description
Currently we have no field where "manufacturer(s) providing data" could be listed. Is connected to issue #23
Solution description
Propose to create new field in section A1 "key dataset information". Good description of this field is needed to deal with "mass data providers", there must be a possibility to sum these up. Question is also if this field needs to be machine readable. Initial thought is: yes it would make sense. Tendency is towards manufacturer specific information. So a contact dataset would make sense. in case of associations, the association contact dataset could be listed. Cannot oversee potential problems in the dataset creation process, if a contact dataset for every company is needed...
okworx
commented
1 month ago
I raise this change request because...
Problem description
Currently we have no field where "manufacturer(s) providing data" could be listed. Is connected to issue #23
Solution description
Propose to create new field in section A1 "key dataset information". Good description of this field is needed to deal with "mass data providers", there must be a possibility to sum these up. Question is also if this field needs to be machine readable. Initial thought is: yes it would make sense. Tendency is towards manufacturer specific information. So a contact dataset would make sense. in case of associations, the association contact dataset could be listed. Cannot oversee potential problems in the dataset creation process, if a contact dataset for every company is needed...
Relevance or added value
Medium relevance