ISO 22057 - EPD type: manufacturer representation & product representation

RobertSpang commented 4 months ago

I raise this change request because...

[ ] the ILCD+EPD format lacks compliance with regualtions.
[X] the ILCD+EPD format lacks conformaty with standards.
[ ] the ILCD+EPD format needs to be improved regarding existing format or master data elements.
[ ] there is another problem or use case I´m trying to address.

Problem description

This issue actually tackles two issues:

manufacturer representation --> valid for a single manufacturing site; valid for several manufacturing sites from the same company with variation below 10 %; valid for several manufacturing sites from the same company with variation above 10 %; valid for several companies’ sites with variation below 10 %; valid for several companies’ sites with variation above 10 %.
product representation --> valid for a single product where variability is not described; valid for a single product where variability is described; valid for a range of products where variability is not described; valid for a range of products where variability is not described

Solution description

Check redundancy with existing B1.2 "subtype" in particular for "manufacturer representation" --> maybe extension possible?

"product representation" would be most likely a new element/field of the format --> guess the list from above will be further specified in the context of the CE mark

Relevance or added value

medium

RobertSpang commented 3 months ago

Ready for further processing; all relevant infomation is available

okworx commented 1 month ago

addressed by #17

InDataWG / ILCD-EPD-Data-Format