Closed TacticalCheerio closed 5 years ago
Thanks for the issue!
I definitely agree that the credential names are confusing, I've mixed them up a lot myself. Where did you see these names you suggested? I think the names we're currently using are just taken from the Python Twitter library we're using. If there are more standardized names Twitter is using in their UI / docs, I'm happy to update our config keys and docs to use that.
When you go to generate the credentials (App > Details > Keys and Tokens) it displays the terms there:
Perfect, thank you! I'll get this updated and put in some kind of message to help people migrate their config over.
Alright, I''ve pushed version 1.0.0b5 to address this. I used a slightly different key name for one of the credentials (api_secret_key
instead of api_key_secret
) to better match the language Twitter uses in the app details.
Migration notes are here: https://github.com/InQuest/ThreatIngestor/releases/tag/v1.0.0b5.
Let me know if you run into any problems migrating your config, or if anything else comes up!
The Twitter credentials in the config.yml and documentation can be more clear:
Instead of the current
This would be more clear, as it uses the same terms and order of keys that Twitter presents