Victor (BiographyNet data): What should we do with BioDes (the biography description = source of information). In Bionet that is modelled as an Aggregation, with proxyIn - bgn:person relation
my suggestion:
we modelled the Cultural Heritage Objects descriptions with “P3 has note” “rdfs:Literal”
-> from Cidoc CRM 7.1.1. definition “This property is a container for all informal descriptions about an object that have not been expressed in terms of CIDOC CRM constructs. In particular, it captures the characterization of the item itself, its internal structures, appearance etc.” (https://cidoc-crm.org/rdfs/7.1.1/CIDOC_CRM_v7.1.1.rdfs)
I would suggest to do that also for the Person_Proxies.
In Bionet's case, the biographical source data is a set of triples (originally multiple XML segments), not one large string . So I am still not sure how to do this. Maybe we leave it now as provenance information.
Victor (BiographyNet data): What should we do with BioDes (the biography description = source of information). In Bionet that is modelled as an Aggregation, with proxyIn - bgn:person relation
my suggestion: we modelled the Cultural Heritage Objects descriptions with “P3 has note” “rdfs:Literal” -> from Cidoc CRM 7.1.1. definition “This property is a container for all informal descriptions about an object that have not been expressed in terms of CIDOC CRM constructs. In particular, it captures the characterization of the item itself, its internal structures, appearance etc.” (https://cidoc-crm.org/rdfs/7.1.1/CIDOC_CRM_v7.1.1.rdfs) I would suggest to do that also for the Person_Proxies.