Open CarlaVS opened 2 years ago
In the current APIS serialization I used the following namespaces.
Namespace 'https://www.intavia.org/sharedentities/' namespace for data in shared entity graph (provided persons and CHOs)
Namespace 'https://www.intavia.org/idm-core/' namespace for own core ontology (see IDM-RDF)
Namespace 'https://www.intavia.org/idm-role/' namespace for roles named graph (subclasses of )
Namespace 'https://www.intavia.org/idm-relations' namespace for relations
Namespace 'https://www.intavia.org/idm-bibl/' namespace for bibliographic named graph
Namespace 'https://www.intavia.org/apis/' namespace for APIS InTaVia named graph
Are there objections about the naming strategy?
Shared namespaces are necessary for the "vocabularies", that we include as subclasses in own namespaces. As we should use shared namespaces, they could be collected and disussed here.