Open sennierer opened 1 year ago
1) The occupations linked using :has_occupation are considered the primary/preferable occupations, and originate from the data provided for BS by the Finnish Literature Association.
2) On the other hand, occupations modeled using :bearer_of/:type are computationally recognized from the events of a particular actor, e.g. occupations/degrees/jobs along his/her lifetime.
Are there any similar practices in other datasets as 2) for occupations? The simpliest solution would be to provide only the occupations now modeled using the 1) direct :has_occupation property
Is it possible that the modelling of occupations in BS is incoherent? Found a person that has P -> bioc:bearer_of -> BN -> type -> captain (Occupation); lieutenant (Occupation), but also P -> bioc:has_occupation -> colonel (Occupation). See the screenshot attached.