Inclusio-Community / json-image-metadata

A specifiction for expressing technical image metadata, with an emphasis on accessibility of data visualizations
2 stars 3 forks source link

Add annotations block #38

Open simonvarey opened 1 week ago

simonvarey commented 1 week ago

Following a suggestion from @shepazu, we could use or adapt the Web Annotation Data Model for the tags field: https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/

shepazu commented 1 week ago

I don't think the Web Annotation Data Model is suitable for tags. It's far too verbose, and doesn't offer any specific ontology for tags.

I do think the Web Annotation Data Model could be adopted/adopted for an as-yet-unspecified feature of JIM, the annotations block.

simonvarey commented 1 week ago

Thanks @shepazu for clearing that up. I had forgotten exactly why we were discussing the Web Annotation Data Model.

With this revision in mind, I'll change the issue to the following: Should we add an annotations block, and if so how much of the Web Annotation Data Model should we use for this feature?