With Google Secret Manager integration, it would be great to see Infisical's name of the project in GCP.
So we can add that either as a secret label or we can add metadata in the integration.
Why would it be useful?
Why would this feature be useful for Infisical users?
It would be good to manage secrets by a project in GCP. I think it makes sense as every secret belongs to per project(service) so we can get that information immediately in GCP too. Also after this is done, we can improve this further by giving some Kubernetes service account access per project in some case usage or even creating a prefix of the secret name so if secrets exit in the TEST project then map that prefix to every secret that belongs to that project.
dangtony98
commented
1 year ago
Feature description
With Google Secret Manager integration, it would be great to see Infisical's name of the project in GCP. So we can add that either as a secret label or we can add metadata in the integration.
Why would it be useful?
Why would this feature be useful for Infisical users?
It would be good to manage secrets by a project in GCP. I think it makes sense as every secret belongs to per project(service) so we can get that information immediately in GCP too. Also after this is done, we can improve this further by giving some Kubernetes service account access per project in some case usage or even creating a prefix of the secret name so if secrets exit in the TEST project then map that prefix to every secret that belongs to that project.
From SyncLinear.com | ENG-92