search

Informatievlaanderen / GIPOD

Generiek Informatie Platform Openbaar Domein
MIT License
9 stars 2 forks source link

GW period-status rules do not apply to SYN. #255

Closed rajeevchugh71 closed 3 years ago

rajeevchugh71 commented 3 years ago

Describe the bug (Urgent & blocking issue) GW period-status rules do not apply to SYN. For ex SYN start date can be set in past whereas a normal GW start date cannot be set in the past in combination with status=Concretely planned & same for other statuses.

Expected behavior SYN GW start dates should not be allowed to be in the past.

PXS-concretely-plan-issue-1 PXS-concretely-plan-issue

Correlation id and request See attachments.

AIV-Bert commented 3 years ago

Hi @rajeevchugh71,

I agree this would be an improvement to the api. But in essence, you are requesting extra validation on the SYN period. This is something with high impact to all users. We need to analyze the impact before we can make a commitment to resolve this issue for you.

Kind regards,

Bert

TomasVerheyen commented 3 years ago

Hi @rajeevchugh71,

I agree this would be an improvement to the api. But in essence, you are requesting extra validation on the SYN period. This is something with high impact to all users. We need to analyze the impact before we can make a commitment to resolve this issue for you.

Kind regards,

Bert

Hello Bert,

I hope you understand that we need to keep a continuity between a groundwork and linked synergie if we are the pilot, or if someone else is the pilot. This creates issues, where a synergy will obtain a different, wrong set of data in accordance to the groundwork, because we can not push the same "wrong" items to a groundwork...

I think this is a serious oversight, therefore should be relabeled as urgent, not as a feature request.

Thank you.

AIV-Bert commented 3 years ago

Hi @TomasVerheyen,

Thank you for your additional feedback. We did not label this issue yet as we are still analyzing this at this very moment. I was just providing an update to the initial request :)

Kind regards,

Bert

naomioste commented 3 years ago

Dag @TomasVerheyen

we nemen dit apart op met jou en Silvie. Kwestie van het probleem goed te begrijpen en een robuuste oplossing samen uit te werken.

Groeten, Naomi