Open brechtvdv opened 3 years ago
@brechtvdv
what is the reason for this request? Documentation or some validation use case?
Because the generated shacl shapes will generate the same messages. At least I believe.
Probably this additional statement might lead to a performance issues. To be checked:
dataset1 dcat:distributie dist1
dist1 dcat:accessService serv1
serv1 dcat:servesDataset dataset1
The last one should first be tested, because I do not know if SHACL has a termination analyser build in.
When you have a shacl:property of a shacl:NodeShape, you can refer to the shacl:Nodeshape this property adheres to. Currently, the toolchain only mentions the shacl:class of the property and does not use shacl:node.
An example with shacl:node added: