Closed xdxxxdx closed 6 months ago
[Spec]: tree:InBetweenRelation should not be used as the current way in time-based fragmentations.
tree:InBetweenRelation
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . @prefix terms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . @prefix tree: <https://w3id.org/tree#> . <../../bearb/timebased?year=2015> rdf:type tree:Node; terms:isPartOf <../../bearb>; tree:relation [ rdf:type tree:InBetweenRelation; tree:node <../../bearb/timebased?year=2015&month=08>; tree:path prov:generatedAtTime; tree:value "2015-08"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#gYearMonth> ] .
This has been discussed since the very beginning of this usage. @pietercolpaert addressed concern on this. https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/82#issuecomment-1709605508 https://vsdscore.slack.com/archives/C03CQKA4RU7/p1691138145204079
Thanks
AP: To replace with GreaterThanOrEquals and LesserThan relations pointing to each fragment
[Spec]:
tree:InBetweenRelation
should not be used as the current way in time-based fragmentations.This has been discussed since the very beginning of this usage. @pietercolpaert addressed concern on this. https://github.com/TREEcg/specification/issues/82#issuecomment-1709605508 https://vsdscore.slack.com/archives/C03CQKA4RU7/p1691138145204079
Thanks