coderabbitai[bot]
commented
6 months ago Walkthrough
The recent updates focus on enhancing the IBC Core Channel module across various Go programs and support files. These changes introduce functions and examples for querying IBC channel details, states, and packet data using the InjectiveLabs SDK and Cosmos SDK, ensuring robust interaction and data retrieval from blockchain networks.
Changes
| Files | Change Summary |
|---|---|
client/chain/chain.go, client/chain/chain_test_support.go |
Added functions in the IBC Core Channel module for handling channel data and state queries. |
examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/1_Channel/..., examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/2_Channels/..., examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/3_ConnectionChannels/..., etc. |
Introduced a series of Go programs for querying various IBC channel-related information such as channel details, client state, packet commitments, and acknowledgements using the InjectiveLabs SDK. |
🐇✨ In the world of code, where the blocks intertwine, A rabbit hopped through, leaving changes so fine. With a twitch of its nose, the channels align, Queries run smooth, in a beautiful design. Celebrate the craft, under the moonshine! 🌕🎉
Recent Review Details
**Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml**Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ac5aaab0a1dbb8c6d4c3ac628f79d419a97686c1 and 4a698eedf0b089b46e3d7835a2fc156325af98d0.Files selected for processing (15)
* client/chain/chain.go (6 hunks) * client/chain/chain_test_support.go (2 hunks) * examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/10_PacketAcknowledgements/example.go (1 hunks) * examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/11_UnreceivedPackets/example.go (1 hunks) * examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/12_UnreceivedAcks/example.go (1 hunks) * examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/13_NextSequenceReceive/example.go (1 hunks) * examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/1_Channel/example.go (1 hunks) * examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/2_Channels/example.go (1 hunks) * examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/3_ConnectionChannels/example.go (1 hunks) * examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/4_ChannelClientState/example.go (1 hunks) * examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/5_ChannelConsensusState/example.go (1 hunks) * examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/6_PacketCommitment/example.go (1 hunks) * examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/7_PacketCommitments/example.go (1 hunks) * examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/8_PacketReceipt/example.go (1 hunks) * examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/9_PacketAcknowledgement/example.go (1 hunks)Additional comments not posted (75)
examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/4_ChannelClientState/example.go (4)
`18-21`: Ensure proper error handling instead of using `panic`. Consider replacing `panic(err)` with a more graceful error handling mechanism, such as logging the error and exiting the program with a non-zero status code. This approach would be more robust in production-like environments. --- `23-31`: Review the security implications of hardcoding sensitive information. It's generally not secure to hardcode sensitive information such as user credentials (`"12345678"`) and private keys (`"5d386fbdbf11f1141010f81a46b40f94887367562bd33b452bbaa6ce1cd1381e"`) directly in the source code. Consider using environment variables or secure vault solutions to manage sensitive data. --- `63-68`: Handle errors gracefully in `FetchIBCChannelClientState`. Instead of just printing the error, consider handling it more robustly by logging the error and potentially retrying the operation or exiting with an error status code. This would improve the resilience of the application. --- `68-68`: Print the result in a more user-friendly format. Consider using `fmt.Printf` with a format string to make the output more readable, especially if `res` contains multiple fields or complex data structures.examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/1_Channel/example.go (4)
`18-21`: Ensure proper error handling instead of using `panic`. As previously mentioned, consider replacing `panic(err)` with a more graceful error handling mechanism. This is crucial for maintaining stability and providing clear error messages to users. --- `23-31`: Review the security implications of hardcoding sensitive information. As noted in the previous file, avoid hardcoding sensitive information directly in the source code. Use secure storage mechanisms to enhance the security posture of your application. --- `64-67`: Handle errors gracefully in `FetchIBCChannel`. Similar to the previous file, improve error handling by logging the error and considering additional recovery or notification mechanisms. --- `69-70`: Improve JSON output formatting. To enhance readability, consider adding a header or a label before printing the JSON string, so that users can easily identify the output.examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/13_NextSequenceReceive/example.go (4)
`18-21`: Ensure proper error handling instead of using `panic`. Continuing the theme from previous files, replace `panic(err)` with more robust error handling practices. This will improve the application's stability and error reporting. --- `23-31`: Review the security implications of hardcoding sensitive information. Again, avoid hardcoding sensitive data such as passwords and private keys. Utilize secure storage solutions to protect this information. --- `64-67`: Handle errors gracefully in `FetchIBCNextSequenceReceive`. Enhance error handling by logging the error and considering mechanisms for retrying the operation or notifying the user, which would be particularly useful in network-related errors. --- `69-70`: Improve JSON output formatting. To make the output more user-friendly, consider adding explanatory text or labels before printing the JSON string.examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/5_ChannelConsensusState/example.go (4)
`18-21`: Ensure proper error handling instead of using `panic`. As with the other files, replace `panic(err)` with a more structured error handling approach. This will enhance the robustness and user experience of the application. --- `23-31`: Review the security implications of hardcoding sensitive information. Consistently with previous files, avoid hardcoding sensitive data. Implement secure mechanisms for managing sensitive information to safeguard user data. --- `65-68`: Handle errors gracefully in `FetchIBCChannelConsensusState`. Improve error handling by logging the error and considering additional recovery or notification mechanisms. This is crucial for operations that might fail due to external dependencies. --- `70-70`: Print the result in a more user-friendly format. Use `fmt.Printf` with a format string to enhance the readability of the output, especially if `res` contains complex data structures.examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/8_PacketReceipt/example.go (4)
`18-21`: Ensure proper error handling instead of using `panic`. Continue to replace `panic(err)` with more robust error handling practices. This will improve the application's stability and error reporting. --- `23-31`: Review the security implications of hardcoding sensitive information. As noted in previous files, avoid hardcoding sensitive information directly in the source code. Use secure storage mechanisms to enhance the security posture of your application. --- `65-67`: Handle errors gracefully in `FetchIBCPacketReceipt`. Improve error handling by logging the error and considering additional recovery or notification mechanisms. This would enhance the resilience of the application. --- `70-71`: Improve JSON output formatting. To enhance readability, consider adding a header or a label before printing the JSON string, so that users can easily identify the output.examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/6_PacketCommitment/example.go (4)
`18-21`: Ensure proper error handling instead of using `panic`. As with the other files, replace `panic(err)` with a more structured error handling approach. This will enhance the robustness and user experience of the application. --- `23-31`: Review the security implications of hardcoding sensitive information. Consistently with previous files, avoid hardcoding sensitive data. Implement secure mechanisms for managing sensitive information to safeguard user data. --- `65-68`: Handle errors gracefully in `FetchIBCPacketCommitment`. Improve error handling by logging the error and considering additional recovery or notification mechanisms. This is crucial for operations that might fail due to external dependencies. --- `70-71`: Improve JSON output formatting. Use `fmt.Printf` with a format string to enhance the readability of the output, especially if `res` contains complex data structures.examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/2_Channels/example.go (4)
`20-23`: Ensure proper error handling instead of using `panic`. Continue to replace `panic(err)` with more robust error handling practices. This will improve the application's stability and error reporting. --- `26-33`: Review the security implications of hardcoding sensitive information. As noted in previous files, avoid hardcoding sensitive information directly in the source code. Use secure storage mechanisms to enhance the security posture of your application. --- `65-68`: Handle errors gracefully in `FetchIBCChannels`. Improve error handling by logging the error and considering additional recovery or notification mechanisms. This would enhance the resilience of the application. --- `70-71`: Improve JSON output formatting. To enhance readability, consider adding a header or a label before printing the JSON string, so that users can easily identify the output.examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/12_UnreceivedAcks/example.go (4)
`18-21`: Ensure proper error handling instead of using `panic`. Continue to replace `panic(err)` with more robust error handling practices. This will improve the application's stability and error reporting. --- `24-31`: Review the security implications of hardcoding sensitive information. As noted in previous files, avoid hardcoding sensitive information directly in the source code. Use secure storage mechanisms to enhance the security posture of your application. --- `65-67`: Handle errors gracefully in `FetchIBCUnreceivedAcks`. Improve error handling by logging the error and considering additional recovery or notification mechanisms. This would enhance the resilience of the application. --- `70-71`: Improve JSON output formatting. To enhance readability, consider adding a header or a label before printing the JSON string, so that users can easily identify the output.examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/9_PacketAcknowledgement/example.go (6)
`20-22`: Consider handling the error without panicking to improve the robustness of the example script. Instead of using `panic`, you might want to log the error and gracefully exit. This approach is generally more robust and user-friendly, especially in production environments or larger applications. --- `34-36`: Similar to the previous comment, consider handling errors more gracefully instead of using `panic`. Using structured error handling can help in debugging and maintaining the code by providing clearer error messages and potentially handling different error conditions differently. --- `44-46`: Again, avoid using `panic` for error handling in production code. Consider implementing a more robust error handling strategy that could involve logging the error or even retrying the operation a certain number of times before failing. --- `56-58`: The use of `panic` for error handling should be avoided. It's advisable to handle errors gracefully. This could include logging the error at a minimum or using more sophisticated error handling strategies depending on the context. --- `66-68`: Ensure proper error handling in the `FetchIBCPacketAcknowledgement` function call. Instead of just printing the error, consider what should happen next. Should the function return? Should there be a retry mechanism? This decision will depend on the expected stability and criticality of the network connection. --- `70-71`: Good use of JSON marshalling to format the output. This is a good practice for making the output more readable and is especially useful in demonstration or debugging scripts.examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/11_UnreceivedPackets/example.go (6)
`20-22`: Consider handling the error without resorting to `panic` for a more robust example script. Using `panic` can be replaced with more graceful error handling techniques such as logging the error and terminating the program with a non-zero status code. --- `34-36`: Avoid using `panic` for error handling; consider alternatives that allow for cleaner error management. Structured error handling can aid in maintaining and debugging the code by providing clear error messages and potentially handling different error conditions differently. --- `44-46`: Replace `panic` with a more graceful error handling approach. Consider implementing a robust error handling strategy that could involve logging the error or even retrying the operation a certain number of times before failing. --- `56-58`: The use of `panic` for error handling should be avoided. Handling errors more gracefully is recommended. This could include logging the error at a minimum or using more sophisticated error handling strategies depending on the context. --- `65-67`: Ensure proper error handling in the `FetchIBCUnreceivedPackets` function call. Instead of just printing the error, consider what should happen next. Should the function return? Should there be a retry mechanism? This decision will depend on the expected stability and criticality of the network connection. --- `70-71`: Good practice of using JSON marshalling to format the output. This enhances readability and is particularly useful in demonstration or debugging scripts.examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/3_ConnectionChannels/example.go (6)
`21-23`: Consider handling the error without resorting to `panic` for a more robust example script. Using `panic` can be replaced with more graceful error handling techniques such as logging the error and terminating the program with a non-zero status code. --- `36-38`: Avoid using `panic` for error handling; consider alternatives that allow for cleaner error management. Structured error handling can aid in maintaining and debugging the code by providing clear error messages and potentially handling different error conditions differently. --- `46-48`: Replace `panic` with a more graceful error handling approach. Consider implementing a robust error handling strategy that could involve logging the error or even retrying the operation a certain number of times before failing. --- `58-60`: The use of `panic` for error handling should be avoided. Handling errors more gracefully is recommended. This could include logging the error at a minimum or using more sophisticated error handling strategies depending on the context. --- `66-68`: Ensure proper error handling in the `FetchIBCConnectionChannels` function call. Instead of just printing the error, consider what should happen next. Should the function return? Should there be a retry mechanism? This decision will depend on the expected stability and criticality of the network connection. --- `71-72`: Good practice of using JSON marshalling to format the output. This enhances readability and is particularly useful in demonstration or debugging scripts.examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/7_PacketCommitments/example.go (6)
`21-23`: Consider handling the error without resorting to `panic` for a more robust example script. Using `panic` can be replaced with more graceful error handling techniques such as logging the error and terminating the program with a non-zero status code. --- `36-38`: Avoid using `panic` for error handling; consider alternatives that allow for cleaner error management. Structured error handling can aid in maintaining and debugging the code by providing clear error messages and potentially handling different error conditions differently. --- `46-48`: Replace `panic` with a more graceful error handling approach. Consider implementing a robust error handling strategy that could involve logging the error or even retrying the operation a certain number of times before failing. --- `58-60`: The use of `panic` for error handling should be avoided. Handling errors more gracefully is recommended. This could include logging the error at a minimum or using more sophisticated error handling strategies depending on the context. --- `67-69`: Ensure proper error handling in the `FetchIBCPacketCommitments` function call. Instead of just printing the error, consider what should happen next. Should the function return? Should there be a retry mechanism? This decision will depend on the expected stability and criticality of the network connection. --- `72-73`: Good practice of using JSON marshalling to format the output. This enhances readability and is particularly useful in demonstration or debugging scripts.examples/chain/ibc/channel/query/10_PacketAcknowledgements/example.go (6)
`21-23`: Consider handling the error without resorting to `panic` for a more robust example script. Using `panic` can be replaced with more graceful error handling techniques such as logging the error and terminating the program with a non-zero status code. --- `36-38`: Avoid using `panic` for error handling; consider alternatives that allow for cleaner error management. Structured error handling can aid in maintaining and debugging the code by providing clear error messages and potentially handling different error conditions differently. --- `46-48`: Replace `panic` with a more graceful error handling approach. Consider implementing a robust error handling strategy that could involve logging the error or even retrying the operation a certain number of times before failing. --- `58-60`: The use of `panic` for error handling should be avoided. Handling errors more gracefully is recommended. This could include logging the error at a minimum or using more sophisticated error handling strategies depending on the context. --- `68-70`: Ensure proper error handling in the `FetchIBCPacketAcknowledgements` function call. Instead of just printing the error, consider what should happen next. Should the function return? Should there be a retry mechanism? This decision will depend on the expected stability and criticality of the network connection. --- `73-74`: Good practice of using JSON marshalling to format the output. This enhances readability and is particularly useful in demonstration or debugging scripts.client/chain/chain_test_support.go (1)
`608-658`: The mock functions for the IBC Core Channel module have been implemented correctly. These functions are crucial for unit testing the new functionalities related to the IBC Core Channel module. They return empty responses, which is typical for initial mock implementations. Consider adding functionality to simulate different scenarios for more comprehensive testing.client/chain/chain.go (12)
`2335-2343`: LGTM! The function `FetchIBCChannel` correctly implements the query for specific IBC channel data. --- `2345-2352`: LGTM! The function `FetchIBCChannels` correctly implements the query for a list of IBC channels with pagination support. --- `2354-2362`: LGTM! The function `FetchIBCConnectionChannels` correctly implements the query for IBC channels associated with a specific connection, with pagination. --- `2364-2372`: LGTM! The function `FetchIBCChannelClientState` correctly implements the query for the client state of a specific IBC channel. --- `2374-2384`: LGTM! The function `FetchIBCChannelConsensusState` correctly implements the query for the consensus state of a specific IBC channel, including revision details. --- `2386-2395`: LGTM! The function `FetchIBCPacketCommitment` correctly implements the query for a specific packet commitment in an IBC channel using a sequence number. --- `2397-2406`: LGTM! The function `FetchIBCPacketCommitments` correctly implements the query for all packet commitments in an IBC channel with pagination support. --- `2408-2417`: LGTM! The function `FetchIBCPacketReceipt` correctly implements the query for a specific packet receipt in an IBC channel using a sequence number. --- `2419-2428`: LGTM! The function `FetchIBCPacketAcknowledgement` correctly implements the query for a specific packet acknowledgement in an IBC channel using a sequence number. --- `2430-2440`: LGTM! The function `FetchIBCPacketAcknowledgements` correctly implements the query for all packet acknowledgements in an IBC channel with pagination support. --- `2442-2451`: LGTM! The function `FetchIBCUnreceivedPackets` correctly implements the query for unreceived packets in an IBC channel using a list of packet commitment sequences. --- `2453-2462`: LGTM! The function `FetchIBCUnreceivedAcks` correctly implements the query for unreceived acknowledgements in an IBC channel using a list of packet acknowledgement sequences.
Solves CHAIN-78
Summary by CodeRabbit