search

InjectiveLabs / sdk-go

Tools to work with the Injective Chain, Injective EVM and EIP712.
Apache License 2.0
95 stars 41 forks source link

Improve error messaging and enhance documentation in eip712_cosmos.go #238

Closed meetrick closed 1 month ago

meetrick commented 1 month ago

This PR improves error handling and enhances documentation in the eip712_cosmos.go file to provide clearer messages and more detailed explanations.

Changes:

  1. Error message improvement:

    • Updated the error message in traverseFields to include the field name when unpacking Any fails. This helps in identifying the specific field that caused the error. err = errors.Wrapf(err, "failed to unpack Any in msg struct at field %s", fieldName)

  2. Enhanced function documentation:

    • Updated the comment for sanitizeTypedef to clearly explain its role in simplifying complex type names and ensuring compatibility with Geth’s signing code, which requires PascalCase for EIP-712 compliance.

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Walkthrough

The changes involve enhancements to error handling and documentation within the eip712_cosmos.go file. Specifically, the error message in the traverseFields function has been updated to include the fieldName variable for better context during unpacking failures. Additionally, comments in the sanitizeTypedef function have been clarified to explain its purpose in simplifying type names for EIP-712 compatibility. Overall, these modifications focus on improving clarity without altering the code's logic or control flow.

Changes

Files Change Summary
eip712_cosmos.go Enhanced error message in traverseFields to include fieldName. Expanded comments in sanitizeTypedef for clarity on type name formatting.

Poem

🐇 In code we hop, with changes bright,
Errors now clearer, a guiding light.
Types simplified, in Pascal's grace,
A leap for clarity, a joyful space!
With every line, our code takes flight,
Hooray for the updates, all feels just right! 🌟

[!TIP]

Announcements - The review status is no longer posted as a separate comment when there are no actionable or nitpick comments. In such cases, the review status is included in the walkthrough comment. - We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the [discussion post](https://discordapp.com/channels/1134356397673414807/1279579842131787838) on our Discord. - Possibly related PRs: Walkthrough comment now includes a list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context. Please share any feedback in the [discussion post](https://discordapp.com/channels/1134356397673414807/1282535539299323995) on our Discord. - Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs in the walkthrough comment. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file. - Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).
Recent review details **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL**
Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b7a68cc0be42f5bdd9476ebc4717efa0053698c9 and 3b34957eeb118e3fd36ef828ef6b2a1320a09103.
Files selected for processing (1) * eip712_cosmos.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
eip712_cosmos.go (2)
`234-234`: **LGTM!** The change to include the `fieldName` in the error message improves the clarity of the error reporting by providing more context about the specific field that caused the error. --- `357-359`: **LGTM!** The updated comment for the `sanitizeTypedef` function provides a clearer explanation of the function's purpose and the reasoning behind the type name simplification and PascalCase formatting.
--- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
aarmoa commented 1 month ago

Hello @meetrick, thank you for the contribution. Could you please rebase the PR pointing to dev branch instead of master?

meetrick commented 1 month ago

Hello @meetrick, thank you for the contribution. Could you please rebase the PR pointing to dev branch instead of master?

I will,