search

InnerSourceCommons / InnerSourceMarketing

Marketing & Outreach working group's board, documents.
8 stars 1 forks source link

Review Research page structure to "future-proof" it to facilitate additional State of InnerSource survey reports. Perhaps mimic "a box per report" approach as in here: https://www.devops-research.com/research.html #106

Open claredillon opened 3 years ago

claredillon commented 3 years ago

Also, add bibliography of academic research [currently ca. 30-40 papers?], which need to be organized in a small set of categories, e.g. 4-6?

lenucksi commented 3 years ago

We should also prepare them in a citable (Bibtex, RIS, etc.) way. If we aim at researchers with this or people with a research past, we will gain credibility with this. Maintaining said bibliography last time in a manual way turned out to be quite the bottle-neck. I suggest we embed the output (or the website itself) of a Zotero or Mendeley group and have a set of maintainers for that one. That way we also get a social media for researchers to follow the latest & greatest on InnerSource research. Both tools are easy to administrate (easy for non-technical users) and reduce the burden of administration as well as they output all common bibliographic formats in a uniform way. Zotero likely has the higher acceptance in academia, Mendeley has the higher budget behind it. Both are free for our use case as far as I remember.

rrrutledge commented 12 months ago

Is there more context on this item? Is it affecting things?

rrrutledge commented 10 months ago

@claredillon holler if you still need this.