Closed daredevil-ferreira closed 4 years ago
I noticed that the small movement are not continuous as if the motherboard was not able to execute smoothly the gcode.
I observed the same after updating a few days agoe on my CR-10S Pro. However, i can't tell if the new firmware is less performant in executing micro movements. Maybe temporarely disabling the LCD interface feature to check any performance issues could help? Can you provide the link or gcode of your model for further investigations?
My GCode https://drive.google.com/open?id=10i5Plwj045Gf7a5AVMZxOFtqspzT7BaU
How can I disable the LCD ?
How can I disable the LCD ?
Don't know exactly how but maybe by disabling the "EXTENSIBLE_UI":
// // Third-party or vendor-customized controller interfaces. // Sources should be installed in 'src/lcd/extensible_ui'. //
Hello. I noticed the same. Flashed the firmware 5 days ago and I have a lot of bubbles in the curved surfaces. I have a CR10s Pro with Octoprint. Do you know a commit that I can checkout in order to get rid of this problem?
Same for me :(
I had the same conclusion between SD & Octoprint SD:
I did suspect an issue with the baud rate and I swith my raspberry 3B to a raspberry 4B and things get a bit better but still not as good as the SD print. Raspberry 4 vs Raspberry 3:
Raspberry 4 vs SD:
I am printing form the SD with same filament to verify. If there is still a reference, I will try to change the firmware for 115000 bauds.
I hope you find a solution :)
Le mar. 5 mai 2020 à 1:02 PM, daredevil-ferreira notifications@github.com a écrit :
I had the same conclusion between SD & Octoprint SD: [image: 20200505_121630] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/46318626/81057838-7f18e800-8ecd-11ea-8cea-64c8453562ad.jpg
I did suspect an issue with the baud rate and I swith my raspberry 3B to a raspberry 4B and things get a bit better but still not as good as the SD print. Raspberry 4 vs Raspberry 3: [image: 20200505_124726] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/46318626/81059292-7a096800-8ed0-11ea-878d-a9f17bbfab8d.jpg
Raspberry 4 vs SD: [image: 20200505_124651] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/46318626/81059328-8ab9de00-8ed0-11ea-82bc-c29dfec7a8eb.jpg
I am printing form the SD with same filament to verify. If there is still a reference, I will try to change the firmware for 115000 bauds.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/InsanityAutomation/Marlin/issues/134#issuecomment-623989340, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALGA64RKGOSIMSXCOW5HTOLRP7W5VANCNFSM4MYT5SVA .
Did you compile the firmware yourself and did you use the provided example config files for the CR10S Pro?
same here, using provided hex file.
I compiled the firmware with platformio, using the provided configuration for the CR10S Pro
Comparing the default "Configuration_adv" to the cr10spro specific one, i see the following difference in the serial buffer config:
DEFAULT: // The ASCII buffer for serial input ...
CR10SPRO:
So the default configures the buffer size to 16 and the cr10spro specific one to 4?
I did use the hex provided. The yellow filament turns ok when printed from the SD.
I just had a look to the 1.60.3 firmware provided by creality, the BUFSIZE is indeed set to 4.
As I understand the source code firmware, for the CR10sPro:
- The configuration_adv.h in this case set the BUFSIZE to 4 also (we are not in the MachineCR10Orig nor SKR13, 14, 14Turbo, PRO11)
We are in the "MachineCR10Orig" since it is defined along the CR10S Pro Version.
In my configuration.h I have //#define MachineCR10Orig // Forces Melzi board
Later in the file
but all: //#define MachineEnder2 //#define MachineEnder3 //#define MachineEnder5 //#define MachineMini //#define MachineCR10
are also in comments.
I see that
But no MachineCR10Orig
But I will enforce BUFSIZE to 4 on my next trial
The firmware change at baud rate set to 115000 did not change quality. I am testing with BUFSIZE set to 4
I see that
if ENABLED(MachineCR10SPro)
define MachineCR10Std
But no MachineCR10Orig
Sorry, you are right. I confused MachineCR10Orig with MachineCR10Std.
No difference in quality of the print despite changing baud rate and BUFSIZE
I have no clue for any new testing.
Many several tries, last : BUFSIZE = 8 , BLOCK_BUFFER_SIZE = 16, baud rate back to 250000
Nothing works. I am going back to test the 1.70 version
Anyone found the reason or a fix for that issue yet? I just printed some stringing towers and there is definitive a huge problem when it comes to printing circles (=a lot of short motions in short short time). Went back to 1.1.9_B7 which works as expected.
No, and I found the same issue with the version 1.70. I was not able to find the first version of the firmware provided by Tiny Machines (I think they called it B6) to verify if the USB issue with circles was there. I did print a lot of items though with this first Tiny Machines firmware and I had never noticed this issue.
Since the Marlin 2 Version, the coordinates of the extruder are shown in realtime on the display. Could it be that the permanent serial communication to the display to update the values introduces a bottleneck?
where can I get the 1.1.9_B7 files ?
I will try to comment the SERIAL_ECHOPAIR_P(X_LBL, lpos.x, SP_Y_LBL, lpos.y, SP_Z_LBL, lpos.z, SP_E_LBL, lpos.e); in the report_logical_position of the motion.cpp file to see if this has an impact.
Good idea
Le dim. 24 mai 2020 à 10:26 AM, daredevil-ferreira notifications@github.com a écrit :
I will try to comment the SERIAL_ECHOPAIR_P(X_LBL, lpos.x, SP_Y_LBL, lpos.y, SP_Z_LBL, lpos.z, SP_E_LBL, lpos.e); in the report_logical_position of the motion.cpp file to see if this has an impact.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/InsanityAutomation/Marlin/issues/134#issuecomment-633197389, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALGA64VGO7CEN54LCIUZ5W3RTDK3XANCNFSM4MYT5SVA .
where can I get the 1.1.9_B7 files ?
It's under the "Creality_DWINTest" branch: https://github.com/InsanityAutomation/Marlin/tree/Creality_DWINTest
I will try to comment the SERIAL_ECHOPAIR_P(X_LBL, lpos.x, SP_Y_LBL, lpos.y, SP_Z_LBL, lpos.z, SP_E_LBL, lpos.e); in the report_logical_position of the motion.cpp file to see if this has an impact.
Did you try it?
Hi not yet, I have a large print still on going. I will try this weekend.
Regards
Le mar. 26 mai 2020 à 17:24, chunter1 notifications@github.com a écrit :
I will try to comment the SERIAL_ECHOPAIR_P(X_LBL, lpos.x, SP_Y_LBL, lpos.y, SP_Z_LBL, lpos.z, SP_E_LBL, lpos.e); in the report_logical_position of the motion.cpp file to see if this has an impact.
Did you try it?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/InsanityAutomation/Marlin/issues/134#issuecomment-634094776, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALBMIIT4SQCK5LJ2JH6Z62LRTPNKPANCNFSM4MYT5SVA .
Unfortunately commenting out "SERIAL_ECHOPAIR_P(..." does not make a difference.
I just adapted the latest original Marlin version "bugfix-2.0.x" for the CR10S-Pro without display support. Hard to say, but i think the print is a bit better - however, i suspect the issue generally started with the transition to Marlin 2.0. Can it be that the focus on more performant 32-bit platforms leaves the 8-bit ones running into trouble?
Same issue for me. upgraded a stock ender 5 plus to DW 6.2. I got these artifacts while printing round objects. I need to slow it down significantly to avoid them.
I noticed if i speed it up, there's a weird sound coming from the motors. Posted a video on reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/ender5plus/comments/gnw43r/tinymachines_firmware_62_stock_ender_5_plus_weird/
I have the same issue with the 1.1.9 B7.
I've asked tiny machine where could I get the initial firmware (B6) I had.
Confirmed. I'm also getting weird moire-like artifacts when printing round objects using the TinyMachines firmware on my Ender 5 Plus. Printing from OctoPrint.
Hello. I noticed the same. Flashed the firmware 5 days ago and I have a lot of bubbles in the curved surfaces. I have a CR10s Pro with Octoprint. Do you know a commit that I can checkout in order to get rid of this problem?
Looks like the bandwidth issue of the UART communication as explained well in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvw3DrVAeTA
Kersey Fabrications has been running in similar quality issues with Marlin 2.0 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smQ3JX_P0vE
I'll try to disable //#define JD_USE_LOOKUP_TABLE
as suggested in this Marlin 2.0 bug
Kersey Fabrications has been running in similar quality issues with Marlin 2.0 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smQ3JX_P0vE I'll try to disable
//#define JD_USE_LOOKUP_TABLE
as suggested in this Marlin 2.0 bug
Isn't this only relevant when junction deviation is enabled which i don't have activated but am using classic jerk instead.
#if HAS_JUNCTION_DEVIATION
// Enable this option for perfect accuracy but maximum
// computation. Should be fine on ARM processors.
//#define JD_USE_MATH_ACOS
// Disable this option to save 120 bytes of PROGMEM,
// but incur increased computation and a reduction
// in accuracy.
#define JD_USE_LOOKUP_TABLE
#endif
Isn't this only relevant when junction deviation is enabled which i don't have activated but am using classic jerk instead.
indeed.. JUNCTION_DEVIATION is disabled by default in TM firmware right?
Isn't this only relevant when junction deviation is enabled which i don't have activated but am using classic jerk instead.
indeed.. JUNCTION_DEVIATION is disabled by default in TM firmware right?
Yes, disabled by default.
Anyway how this parameter can have a distinct impact regarding if the print is sent via Octoprint or the SD card ?
Has anyone got the Marlin 1.1.6 Version of Tiny Machines? As mentioned in the video below, the quality should be fine with it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smQ3JX_P0vE
I'm switching to Klipper firmware since i wanna get rid of that annoying Creality DWIN display solution on my CR10S Pro anyway. [Update:] Just a quick update on Klipper running on my CR10S Pro. The documentation of Klipper is really good and installation is easy. Print of circles are running smooth and fast compared to Marlin. Besides the flawless print quality, the "on-the-fly" editable configuration is such an enhancement over Marlin. Further i got a 4,3" IPS display with capacitive touch to replace the really stupid one of Creality. So far, i can absolutely recommend the switch to Klipper.
What config did you use in Klipper ? I thought that Klipper was not running on the CR10s Pro (https://github.com/KevinOConnor/klipper/issues/1113)
Regards
What config did you use in Klipper ? I thought that Klipper was not running on the CR10s Pro
That issue is already fixed. I have setup my own Klipper config by using the example config in the wiki.
That's awesome!... With OctoKlipper you get performance graphs of your Klipper system :)
I am using Klipper and I am also very pleased. Bed Mesh leveling works even better than with marlin
What config did you use in Klipper ?
I thought that Klipper was not running on the CR10s Pro
That issue is already fixed.
I have setup my own Klipper config by using the example config in the wiki.
Hi
I have the same issue.
Could you please share your config with me? I want to give klipper a try. Thank you so much
Here is my Klipper config for the CR10S Pro so far. Please note, that I modded the TMC2208 on the Creality motherboard to support UART as described here: https://www.3dprintingforum.org/creality3d/126203-tmc2208-uart-on-cr10s-pro-for-linear-advance-guide#post126203 That way, i can use pressure advance (linear advance) on my CR10S Pro. :-) Further, for bed leveling, i am using a BLTouch. I highly recommend looking at the example config files Klipper provides in it's documentation.
[stepper_x] step_pin: ar54 dir_pin: ar55 enable_pin: !ar38 step_distance: .0125 endstop_pin: ^ar3 position_endstop: 0 position_max: 310 homing_speed: 80
[stepper_y] step_pin: ar60 dir_pin: !ar61 enable_pin: !ar56 step_distance: .0125 endstop_pin: ^ar14 position_endstop: 0 position_max: 310 homing_speed: 80
[stepper_z] step_pin: ar46 dir_pin: !ar48 enable_pin: !ar62 step_distance: .0025 endstop_pin: probe: z_virtual_endstop position_min: -5.0 position_max: 400
[extruder] step_pin: ar26 dir_pin: ar28 enable_pin: !ar24 step_distance: .00717641 nozzle_diameter: 0.400 filament_diameter: 1.750 heater_pin: ar10 sensor_type: EPCOS 100K B57560G104F sensor_pin: analog13 min_temp: 0 max_temp: 250 min_extrude_temp: 170 max_extrude_only_distance: 600 pressure_advance: 0.5 max_extrude_only_velocity: 200 max_extrude_only_accel: 3000
[tmc2208 extruder] uart_pin: ar33 microsteps: 16 interpolate: True run_current: 0.730 sense_resistor: 0.150
[heater_bed] heater_pin: ar8 sensor_type: ATC Semitec 104GT-2 sensor_pin: analog14 min_temp: 0 max_temp: 110
[fan] pin: ar9
[mcu] serial: /dev/serial/by-id/usb-FTDI_FT232R_USB_UART_AL05IRGY-if00-port0 pin_map: arduino
[printer] kinematics: cartesian max_velocity: 300 max_accel: 1500 max_z_velocity: 10 max_z_accel: 50 square_corner_velocity: 5
[safe_z_home] home_xy_position: 150,150 # Change coordinates to the center of your print bed speed: 50 z_hop: 10 # Move up 10mm z_hop_speed: 5
[force_move] enable_force_move: True
[bltouch] sensor_pin: ^ar18 control_pin: ar11 set_output_mode: 5V x_offset: -33.0 y_offset: -2.0 speed: 10
[bed_mesh] speed: 200 mesh_min: 50,50 mesh_max: 250,250 probe_count: 4,4
[filament_switch_sensor my_filemant_sensor] pause_on_runout: True pause_delay: 0.5 switch_pin: ar2
Bed Mesh leveling works even better than with marlin
I noticed that aswell. :)
Another thing i like is that there is no crypic EEPROM storage used. Instead, the values are appended to the config-file thus you can always have a look at the values stored.
Here is my Klipper config for the CR10S Pro so far.
Please note, that I modded the TMC2209 on the Creality motherboard to support UART as described here: https://www.3dprintingforum.org/creality3d/126203-tmc2208-uart-on-cr10s-pro-for-linear-advance-guide#post126203
That way, i can use pressure advance (linear advance) on my CR10S Pro. :-)
Further, for bed leveling, i am using a BLTouch.
I highly recommend looking at the example config files Klipper provides in it's documentation.
[stepper_x]
step_pin: ar54
dir_pin: ar55
enable_pin: !ar38
step_distance: .0125
endstop_pin: ^ar3
position_endstop: 0
position_max: 310
homing_speed: 80
[stepper_y]
step_pin: ar60
dir_pin: !ar61
enable_pin: !ar56
step_distance: .0125
endstop_pin: ^ar14
position_endstop: 0
position_max: 310
homing_speed: 80
[stepper_z]
step_pin: ar46
dir_pin: !ar48
enable_pin: !ar62
step_distance: .0025
endstop_pin: probe: z_virtual_endstop
position_min: -5.0
position_max: 400
[extruder]
step_pin: ar26
dir_pin: ar28
enable_pin: !ar24
step_distance: .00717641
nozzle_diameter: 0.400
filament_diameter: 1.750
heater_pin: ar10
sensor_type: EPCOS 100K B57560G104F
sensor_pin: analog13
min_temp: 0
max_temp: 250
min_extrude_temp: 170
max_extrude_only_distance: 600
pressure_advance: 0.5
max_extrude_only_velocity: 200
max_extrude_only_accel: 3000
[tmc2208 extruder]
uart_pin: ar33
microsteps: 16
interpolate: True
run_current: 0.730
sense_resistor: 0.150
[heater_bed]
heater_pin: ar8
sensor_type: ATC Semitec 104GT-2
sensor_pin: analog14
min_temp: 0
max_temp: 110
[fan]
pin: ar9
[mcu]
serial: /dev/serial/by-id/usb-FTDI_FT232R_USB_UART_AL05IRGY-if00-port0
pin_map: arduino
[printer]
kinematics: cartesian
max_velocity: 300
max_accel: 1500
max_z_velocity: 10
max_z_accel: 50
square_corner_velocity: 5
[safe_z_home]
home_xy_position: 150,150 # Change coordinates to the center of your print bed
speed: 50
z_hop: 10 # Move up 10mm
z_hop_speed: 5
[force_move]
enable_force_move: True
[bltouch]
sensor_pin: ^ar18
control_pin: ar11
set_output_mode: 5V
x_offset: -33.0
y_offset: -2.0
speed: 10
[bed_mesh]
speed: 200
mesh_min: 50,50
mesh_max: 250,250
probe_count: 4,4
[filament_switch_sensor my_filemant_sensor]
pause_on_runout: True
pause_delay: 0.5
switch_pin: ar2
*# <---------------------- SAVE_CONFIG ---------------------->
*# DO NOT EDIT THIS BLOCK OR BELOW. The contents are auto-generated.
*
*# [bltouch]
*# z_offset = 2.140
*
*# [bed_mesh default]
*# version = 1
*# points =
*# 0.027500, -0.010000, 0.027500, 0.177500
*# 0.050000, -0.015000, 0.022500, 0.140000
*# -0.032500, -0.057500, -0.017500, 0.080000
*# 0.015000, -0.010000, 0.045000, 0.180000
*# x_count = 4
*# y_count = 4
*# mesh_x_pps = 2
*# mesh_y_pps = 2
*# algo = lagrange
*# tension = 0.2
*# min_x = 50.0000000001
*# max_x = 249.975
*# min_y = 50.0000000001
*# max_y = 249.975
*
*# [extruder]
*# control = pid
*# pid_kp = 26.636
*# pid_ki = 1.296
*# pid_kd = 136.840
*
*# [heater_bed]
*# control = pid
*# pid_kp = 67.769
*# pid_ki = 0.881
*# pid_kd = 1303.702
Thank you! I will try :)
I added this macro to the printer.cfg file to be able to tune the Z offset.
================================== [gcode_macro G29] gcode: G1 Z10 F600
SET_GCODE_OFFSET Z=-0.48
BED_MESH_CALIBRATE
I added this macro to the printer.cfg file to be able to tune the Z offset.
================================== [gcode_macro G29] gcode: G1 Z10 F600
Sheet 1# SET_GCODE_OFFSET Z=-0.645
Sheet 2# SET_GCODE_OFFSET Z=-0.48
SET_GCODE_OFFSET Z=-0.48 BED_MESH_CALIBRATE
Use the following to calibrate z offset in the terminal. Keep lowering the nozzle using TESTZ commands until you find the z offset. Then send an ACCEPT, and SAVE_CONFIG to save it in the printer.cfg file
PROBE_CALIBRATE TESTZ Z=-.1 ACCEPT SAVE_CONFIG
Description
I updated both motherboard & screen firmware (hex file and DWIN_SET provided on github)
And try to print these parts : https://drive.google.com/open?id=14RO5IvE9s4Z2HT-RN2ahGumINT-ekl8X
with 2 different filaments.
I have a CR10s Pro and launch these prints via Octoprint.
The round shapes are ugly with a lot of blobs where as the length are more or less ok.
I noticed that the small movement are not continuous as if the motherboard was not able to execute smoothly the gcode.
Is it the Octoprint interface of the fact than now the screen displays every movement (X, Y, Z) while printing ?
I am going to test it directly from an SDcard.