Feat: Initial reactivateERC1155Assets functionality

[CruzMolina]

• doc: update IAssetHandler depositERC1155/721Assets NatSpec
• feat: define reactivateERC1155Assets in IPerpetualMint
• feat: define ERC1155AssetsReactivated event in IPerpetualMintInternal
• feat: define initial _reactivateERC1155Assets & _reactivateSingleERC1155Asset functions in PerpetualMintInternal
• feat: define initial reactivateERC155Assets fn in PerpetualMint
• style: normalize Storage.Layout parameter naming in PerpetualMintInternal _reactivateSingleERC1155Asset fn
• build: add reactivateERC1155Assets fn selector to PerpetualMintHelper for diamondCut
• build: fix PerpetualMint idleERC1155Tokens test contract naming
• build: fix PerpetualMint updateERC1155TokenRisks NatSpec for specific test case
• build: fix PerpetualMint updateERC1155TokenRisks fn typo for specific test case
• build: initial PerpetualMint reactivateERC1155Assets tests
• build: update uint64 data types to uint256 in PerpetualMint reactivateERC1155Assets behavior tests

[CruzMolina]

Have wip behavior tests for this, waiting on https://github.com/Insrt-Finance/insrt-v2-contracts/pull/76.

[NouDaimon]

Looking at _updateSingleERC1155Risk I need to apply some of my own feedback (with the enforces) but I think there is a lot of overlap between this functionality and the _updateSingleERC1155Risk which can handle activating non-active tokens.

Are the functionalities different enough to warrant different functions?