Closed mwahle closed 3 months ago
I see. Let me understand this right.
If you do a findEntity with a "_ref" and get, say 2 results (a and b), and if you use that reference and do another find, and get 4 results (x, y, z, w), you would like to be able to tell which of those 4 are linked to which of the 2 on the first find (say, a linked to x and y, and b linked to z and w). Is this right?
This is exactly right.
From: Luis [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 7:03 PM To: IntelLabs/vdms Cc: Manuel Wahle; Author Subject: Re: [IntelLabs/vdms] Link entities from result sets (#70)
CAUTION: This email comes from an external source; the attachments and/or links may compromise our secure environment. Do not open or click on suspicious emails. Please click on the “Phish Alert” button on the top right of the Outlook dashboard to report any suspicious emails.
I see. Let me understand this right.
If you do a findEntity with a "_ref" and get, say 2 results (a and b), and if you use that reference and do another find, and get 4 results (x, y, z, w), you would like to be able to tell which of those 4 are linked to which of the 2 on the first find (say, a linked to x and y, and b linked to z and w). Is this right?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FIntelLabs%2Fvdms%2Fissues%2F70%23issuecomment-453310096&data=02%7C01%7Cmwahle%40montefiore.org%7C1ddf94f403624bc9087708d67758401b%7C9c01f0fd65e040c089a82dfd51e62025%7C1%7C0%7C636827618314560643&sdata=%2Bvd9GeM56p%2FdloT5EYo%2FY51Gr58TMhoqsRCz1TaS8%2F4%3D&reserved=0, or mute the threadhttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAA-cEoJqi012cf01qf42e-xq9pSQUvSkks5vB9SZgaJpZM4Z4Jn1&data=02%7C01%7Cmwahle%40montefiore.org%7C1ddf94f403624bc9087708d67758401b%7C9c01f0fd65e040c089a82dfd51e62025%7C1%7C0%7C636827618314570651&sdata=JxujryrHnSEJnnlS2zxOm7OIZ%2FtRElRtuJjlkYg0gZE%3D&reserved=0.
@cwlacewe I see what they're talking about, but unclear if this is even something desired at this point, and may be complicated to implement.
Currently, when there are multiple FindEntitiy blocks, one gets multiple result sets where the entities are not linked to each other, even when there were refs between the FindEntity blocks.
This makes interpreting results difficult, requires multiple query rounds, or requires workarounds in the schema design, all of which are not desirable.
Please add a mechanism that directly shows the links between entities from different FindEntity blocks.