Closed shainegordon closed 9 months ago
TBF, this validation might be too specific, as it won't be used on 99% of fields.
Maybe this is best left to the developer?
Hi @shainegordon,
This was already on our backlog to be done soon, we'll absolutely add it as an option on the stereotype 🙂
I'll update this issue once a pre-release is available.
TBF, this validation might be too specific, as it won't be used on 99% of fields.
Maybe this is best left to the developer?
Just in regards to this question, in this case we already felt it was common enough to add it to the list, we will also configure it so it will only show if the field type is string.
Hi @shainegordon, this is now available in the following modules:
Please don't hesitate to reach out should you have any feedback or questions 🙂.
Hi @shainegordon, this is now available in the following modules:
- Intent.Application.FluentValidation.Dtos 3.7.1-pre.2
- Intent.Application.MediatR.FluentValidation 4.4.2-pre.2
Please don't hesitate to reach out should you have any feedback or questions 🙂.
Fantastic
What problem are you trying to solve?
FluentValidation comes with a helpful validation method
.Email()
, similar to.NotEmpty()
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be great if the Service designer supported this, via another checkbox, like
Not Empty
,Custom
,Must