Closed ryanthompson591 closed 5 years ago
I will check with Freewheel to clarify the question. Otherwise we will close since it isnt clear what the discussion is about to us.
I think this is now obsolete as we've made many changes to errors and SIVIC overall.
Freewheel indicated that some errors regarding resizing shouldn't necessarily stop playback. To what extent should prefer adding player capabilities?
--- entire conversation below --- Regarding error in 1000 block: Traditionally error event is the last ad breath. In other words - errors imply ad destruction.
Are, for example errors 1007 and 1008 imply that ad becomes non-functional? Or these (and other) errors are designed to notify ad about limitations.
If former - is player obligated to stop video playback?
Player environment limitations do not organically fall into error category. If there is a need for ad to receive feedback, either we need to introduce new notifications category or, better, limitations should be communicated by player to ad at bootstrapping/handshake/initialization.
FreeWheel TV 12:25 PM Mar 22 Shouldn't these be defined in the VAST 4.1 specification instead?
Pieter Mees 3:30 PM Mar 22 Also, currently in VAST all VPAID errors are coerced back into a single 901 error code. This means a lot of debugging information gets lost in VAST error pixels. Can we correct that?