search

InteractiveAdvertisingBureau / openrtb2.x

OpenRTB 2.x specification, from 2.6 onward
73 stars 49 forks source link

OpenRTB 2.6-202409 #103

Closed hillslatt closed 3 weeks ago

hillslatt commented 4 months ago

OpenRTB Updates:

Updated buyeruid attribute description in Object: User Updated ifa attribute description in Object: User New attributes (inserter, matcher, mm) in Object: EID Updated source attribute description in in Object: EID New Implementation Guidance with multiple Bridging Scenarios Added Appendix C: Cookie Based ID Syncing

pm-harshad-mane commented 3 months ago

In example 4, and 5, the buyeruid is passed and the same ID is mentioned in the eids arrray as buyeruid is derived. In example 6 and 7 the device.ifa is mentioned as it is retrieved directly from CTV OS hence it mentioned In example 8, device.ifa is not mentioned as it not retrieved directly from CTV OS ,so only mentioned in eids

So if buyeruid is derived we mention it in buyeruid and eids But if device.ifa can be derived we do not recommend to set it in device.ifa but only allow to be passed in eids.

is it a correct understanding?

pm-harshad-mane commented 3 months ago

matcher, inserter and source are expected to be domain names (strings)... Can we suggest to pass GVL ID instead? Will not work for passing publisher domain but thinking of sustainability, will be able to save some characters from payload.

pm-harshad-mane commented 3 months ago

In reference to Example 5, I might be missing some key information, but I'm wondering if it's necessary to make uids[].id mandatory when the eid has "source": "universalid.com". My concern is that DSPs may not be able to validate this value, and including it could lead to an increased payload size. I would appreciate any clarification or additional insights on this matter.