Website review 11/17/2023

[masinter]

These are review comments on the current website 11/17/2023

• [x] The subtitle "a futureistic software system" still appears in all caps. It should be all lower case.e
• [ ] THe top bar right justification winds up cutting off all but "History Project Software" and chopping off "Get INvoved Github and Search this site".
• [x] the page footer still as a twitter bird instead of X.
• [ ] the email link in the page footer is to "INterlisp@googlegroups.com". I don't think we want newcomers to post complaints on email. info@interlisp.org was set up for this.
• [x] Maybe this isn't the start of a new chapter in computing! I like modesty better.
• [x] https://interlisp.org/history/ the link to "Interlisp Timeline" is garbage, as is the Publications link in the main body.
• [x] "are now of historical nature" leav`s me scratching my head.
• [x] https://interlisp.org/history/publications/ has only 2 links in it. Why not just add a header with a pointer to zotero.com at the head of the Zotero direct bibliography
• [ ] The table derived from Zotero is missing important information -- include the date and genre (report, video, web site, etc.)
• [x] you can put the link to Zotero at top of our copy and get rid of the duplication
• [x] https://interlisp.org/history/timeline/
• [x] in Memoriam -- i'm leaning toward removing it after all, or merging it into the "our stories" page somehow
• [x] The History pageno longer features the ACM Software System Award
• [x] there are some interesting documents in https://github.com/masinter/Masinter.github.io that are not linked. "1981 symbolics-offer.pdf" and 1984-old-old.mail.txt for example.

... more later

[pamoroso]

Cool, did Symbolics plan or carry out Interlisp work?

[Kirtai]

The link to the glossary on the main page has an extra "medley/" in it.

[stumbo]

@Kirtai Thanks for pointing that out.  PR 172 fixes the issue.