Focusing on the generalization of concepts, functionality, and overall processes involved in the creation of a secure 'network of trusted data' , the IDS-RAM resides at a higher abstraction level than common architecture models of concrete software solutions do. The document provides an overview and dedicated architecture specifications.
The UML diagram shows that it is the Data provider search metadata, and Data consumer publish metadata.
From my idea, it should be the other direction: Data provider publish metadata, and Data consumer search metadata.
please see: [Please correct me if I made a mistake]
In the RMA3.0, the diagram was showing Data provider publish metadata, and Data consumer search metadata.
please refer to the paper: Data provider publish metadata, and Data consumer search metadata.IDSA-Position-Paper-GAIA-X-and-IDS.pdf
In the page: https://docs.internationaldataspaces.org/ids-ram-4/layers-of-the-reference-architecture-model/3-layers-of-the-reference-architecture-model/3-1-business-layer/3_1_2_interaction_of_roles
The UML diagram shows that it is the Data provider search metadata, and Data consumer publish metadata. From my idea, it should be the other direction: Data provider publish metadata, and Data consumer search metadata. please see:
[Please correct me if I made a mistake]
In the RMA3.0, the diagram was showing Data provider publish metadata, and Data consumer search metadata. please refer to the paper: Data provider publish metadata, and Data consumer search metadata. IDSA-Position-Paper-GAIA-X-and-IDS.pdf
Thanks XD
_Originally posted by @xdxxxdx in https://github.com/International-Data-Spaces-Association/IDS-RAM_4_0/discussions/220_