Closed anilturkmayali closed 1 year ago
This picture is wrong.
It should be Connector B (acting as Data Consumer)
and Connector A (acting as Data Provider)
Also, line 33 of the README.md file should be changed accordingly.
Wrong --> ![first_version](./pictures/Testbed_1.0.png)
Correct --> ![first_version](./pictures/MVDS-Testbed_1.0.png)
@jfernandezsqs If I get you right, it should be like this:
graph TD
A["Connector A (acting as Data Provider)"] -- request data from connector A on request --- C[ ]
B["Connector B (acting as Data Consumer)"] -- provide data to connector B on request --- C;
classDef connector fill:#d5e8d4,stroke:#A2C68D,stroke-width:2px
class A connector;
class B connector;
classDef emptybox fill:#ffe6cc,stroke:#D79B01,stroke-width:2px,height:40px,width:160px,x:-80px,y:-20px
class C emptybox;
I am wondering, if the edge/connection description make any sense in this configuration? What do you think regarding these descriptions?
A: request data from connector A on request B: provide data to connector B on request
This picture is wrong. It should be
Connector B (acting as Data Consumer)
andConnector A (acting as Data Provider)
Also, line 33 of the README.md file should be changed accordingly. Wrong -->
![first_version](./pictures/Testbed_1.0.png)
Correct -->![first_version](./pictures/MVDS-Testbed_1.0.png)
Thank you for the feedback @jfernandezsqs the changes are reflected in the updated branch.
Changed the MVDS visual, by replacing one connector's role as Data Consumer.
The issue was originally raised here: https://github.com/International-Data-Spaces-Association/idsa/issues/129