Closed HaydarAk closed 3 years ago
There is a small mistake in our modeling.
In the ids:Rule class, the ids:constraint property points to ids:Contraint. The corresponding Rule Shape indicates that we should refer to the superclass of ids:Constraint. In the current implementation, we can not refer to LogicalConstraints from rules. https://github.com/International-Data-Spaces-Association/InformationModel/blob/54146ee8097fe12a45b4ec4bffe501765d96284d/testing/contract/RuleShape.ttl#L88-L94
ids:constraint
ids:Contraint
There is a small mistake in our modeling.
In the ids:Rule class, the
ids:constraint
property points toids:Contraint
. The corresponding Rule Shape indicates that we should refer to the superclass of ids:Constraint. In the current implementation, we can not refer to LogicalConstraints from rules. https://github.com/International-Data-Spaces-Association/InformationModel/blob/54146ee8097fe12a45b4ec4bffe501765d96284d/testing/contract/RuleShape.ttl#L88-L94