Closed JohannesLipp closed 2 years ago
Looks good for me, at least from an RDF perspective :)
Please resolve the two questions / fixes.
Important note (and the reason why I revoked my approval) We have re-evaluate the policy-related classes and especially the codes.
The ids:Action
, ids:BinaryOperator
and maybe other odrl-based classes have some instances which are equivalent to the odrl counterpart while others are more precise or new. Until now this was not a concern due to the fact taht we use the idsc
namespace and subClassOf
relation.
The reevaluation may result in two sets of actions (for example).
some ids:Actions and some odrl:Action.
( Feel free to resolve existing merge conflicts, which came up until now :) )
@HaydarAk @pnlinden Please review the current state as I incorporated Haydar's request for changes w.r.t. the policies and codes. Thank you!
Please see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17RjLl6wkL_V2_jbf_vBfJ_77NgmENnf_tIfWZsNhr_Y/edit#gid=0 for details.