search

International-Data-Spaces-Association / ids-specification

The Dataspace Protocol is a set of specifications designed to facilitate interoperable data sharing between entities governed by usage control and based on Web technologies. These specifications define the schemas and protocols required for entities to publish data, negotiate Agreements, and access data in a data space
https://docs.internationaldataspaces.org/dataspace-protocol/
Apache License 2.0
26 stars 14 forks source link

ODRL IDS-Profile.ttl still valid for the DSP? #178

Open matgnt opened 7 months ago

matgnt commented 7 months ago

Is the ODRL profile created for IDS still valid in the DSP? I'm especially interested in the leftOperand fields

https://docs.internationaldataspaces.org/dataspace-protocol/ "Other Resources"

Screenshot from 2023-11-22 15-17-05

From the gitbook page there is a link into those files but it is not mentioned anywhere else in the spec.

Thanks

-- Matthias Binzer

ssteinbuss commented 7 months ago

Should go to the best practices, introduce that Data Spaces need to define Data Space Policies and the left-operands.

arnoweiss commented 1 week ago

I think this issue can be closed as the profile appears to be managed here [1] and there's no reference in the spec to it.

[1] https://github.com/International-Data-Spaces-Association/ODRL-profile-for-IDS

matgnt commented 6 days ago

Hi @arnoweiss no, there is no reference in the spec to it, but in the published version as you can see in the screenshot above. Therefore, for the reader of the published version it looks like it belongs together, but the spec itself never touches the topic of the profile - and it has never been discussed in the group - at least not during the year before the DSP has been released as 0.8.

So I would say the question remains valid. Is this profile relevant for DSP or not. If yes, it should be properly referenced somewhere in the spec. If not, the published version should not link to it in its header navigation bar.

arnoweiss commented 6 days ago

This is likely just an issue of publication layout and should disappear when IDSA and EDWG documents are more separated. I think it's implausible that could be interpreted as a normative reference.

matgnt commented 6 days ago

Yes, it is a publication layout issue and in case the spec is published somewhere else, this is resolved.