Open CaitlinPries opened 2 years ago
We came up with that convention, if I remember correctly, in order to preserve the records where that was how the data were recorded in the paper. It's not a new thing. Not the most elegant solution, so this could be an opportunity to rethink that approach. Thoughts?
I thought we decided not to have Inf anymore?
Some R code just broke because Biedenbender_2004.xlsx had 'Inf' for post bomb fraction modern. This had not happened before, so I am wondering if the 'Inf' is a new thing. Is that really our convention or was it a mistake?