Also changing field name to channelId to be more intuitive.
@Vivek-NatWest @mhmcclung Please note this change - there was no need to be sending a whole channel object in broadcast messages, we just need the channel.id. This was correct in the docs but not in the schemas. As it tripped me up, it seems sensible to change the field name to be more intuitive (channel -> channelId).
Also changing field name to
channelIdto be more intuitive.@Vivek-NatWest @mhmcclung Please note this change - there was no need to be sending a whole channel object in broadcast messages, we just need the
channel.id. This was correct in the docs but not in the schemas. As it tripped me up, it seems sensible to change the field name to be more intuitive (channel->channelId).@tpina go ahead and merge this if you're happy.