Open VladimirAlexiev opened 1 week ago
Thanks @VladimirAlexiev - I am pretty sure it is the "interpretation" of Protégé of the owl:imports
axiom in Line 14
@gatemezing No:
That might be a tooling issue (the editor used for implementing the ontology). In any case, it is not a manual copy, hence not a big issue we suppose here for a machine to consume the ontology. In this case, this information is within therdfs:comment
property of wgs:
ontology.
There are 90 lines of metadata about the
wgs:
ontology. Having definitions of external terms you use is good, so as to make ERA a self-contained ontology. But copying the metadata of external ontologies is not needed, so remove it.