separate description from label

[VladimirAlexiev]

era:allocationCompany rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ;
                      rdfs:domain era:SubsidiaryLocation ;
                      rdfs:range era:Body ;
                      rdfs:label "allocation company"@en ,
                                 "the organisation in charge to allocate the code for the subsidiary location"@en .

Similarly to https://github.com/Interoperable-data/ERA-Ontology-3.1.0/issues/45, here we need to split the the into two props. The label should be quite the same as the localname and shouldn't include explanations:

  rdfs:label "allocation company"@en ,
  rdfs:comment "the organisation in charge to allocate the code for the subsidiary location"@en .

[VladimirAlexiev]

Here's another example of labels that are too long:

• demonstrationINF: EI declaration of demonstration (as defined Commission 2014/881/EU) for track relating to compliance with the requirements from TSIs applicable to infrastructure subsystem
• demonstrationSRT: EI declaration of demonstration (as defined in Recommendation 2014/881/EU) relating to compliance with the requirements from TSIs applicable to railway tunnel
• demonstrationENE: EI declaration of demonstration (as defined Recommendation 2014/881/EU) for track relating to compliance with the requirements from TSIs applicable to energy subsystem

These should be changed to eg:

• demonstration of infrastructure subsystem compliance
• demonstration of tunnel compliance
• demonstration of energy subsystem compliance

The rest should go into description.

[VladimirAlexiev]

Here's another example:

• etcsSystemFunctionalitiesNextFiveYears: ETCS system version 2.2 or 3.0 functionalities to be required in the next 5 years. Deprecated with TWG RINF CCS 2024.
• should become: ETCS system functionalities in next 5 years