search

Interoperable-data / ERA_vocabulary

ERA vocabulary is an ontology defined by the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA) to describe the concepts and relationships related to the European railway infrastructure and the vehicles authorized to operate over it.
https://data-interop.era.europa.eu/era-vocabulary/
MIT License
4 stars 3 forks source link

Show inSkosConceptScheme property in the widoco documentation #9

Closed MathiasVDA closed 1 month ago

MathiasVDA commented 1 year ago

In the TTL export of the vocabulary I see this:

###  http://data.europa.eu/949/navigability
:navigability rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ;
              rdfs:domain :NetRelation ;
              rdfs:range <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept> ;
              :inSkosConceptScheme <http://data.europa.eu/949/concepts/navigabilities/Navigabilities> ;
              :rinfIndex "1.1.1.0.1.2" ,
                         "1.2.4.1" ;
              <http://purl.org/dc/terms/created> "2021-04-01"^^xsd:date ;
              <http://purl.org/dc/terms/modified> "2021-08-03"^^xsd:date ;
              <http://purl.org/dc/terms/source> <https://rsm-evolution.org/220927_RSM/EARoot/EA2/EA2/EA286.html> ;
              rdfs:comment "Indicates the navigation possibilities between two related topological objects. The allowed values for this property belong to the SKOS Concept Scheme http://data.europa.eu/949/concepts/navigabilities/Navigabilities."@en ;
              rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://data.europa.eu/949/> ;
              rdfs:label "Navigability"@en ;
              <http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/ns#term_status> "stable" ;
              <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel> "Internal connection"@en .

The navigability has a property :inSkosConceptScheme that references the applicable conceptscheme. The widoco documentation however doesn't show this information:

image

The information is contained in the description of the class but I think this is not the right place. Now you have to manage both description and property and both can contain conflicting information. I propose to at least add the official information to the documentation (the property value) and maybe in time edit the descriptions to avoid duplicating information.

ednaru commented 1 year ago

The Widoco code would need to be tweaked in order to show additional metadata that we have been adding to the terms. In the meantime we have provided the URI of the concept in the definition that you can copy and paste (we have also added an issue) in Widoco.

gatemezing commented 2 months ago

I was able to fix this by adding the corresponding (annotation) properties in Widoco like this one in the figure. We will use this version for the next release.

profileNumberSwapBodies
ednaru commented 1 month ago

Widoco has been already improved for release 3.1.0. Will keep current Widoco for release 3.0.1.