Open m-i-k-e opened 6 months ago
this is implemented I believe if not, discussion can move to newer issues
I've tested this flow, and there are some UX problems. Unfortunately, I've ran out of test ADA (could only do one test) and will have to re-test tomorrow.
What I've found:
The Proposal part of govtool is not integrated properly, full stop. To be well designed, and usable, we need to look at the overall UX of how Governance Actions are created, managed, voted on, viewed, etc. What are the problems:
A comprehensive critique of what is up with this flow, and some ideas on how to fix it. https://www.loom.com/share/5c1f0710628646708cd7cb77189d1bf0?sid=1f798d8d-e4ec-43f3-b9c2-0aa876a15039
On the Proposal Discussion Forum Figma, the proposal part of Governance Actions is not integrated with the flow on the GovTool Figma (which is being built). A Governance Action (or it could be called a Governance Proposal) is a single thing with multiple stages.
All of these stages must be supported by the design and navigation of each proposal.
Furthermore, the Governance Action section currently on govtool must support aggregated searching of all the above, with a clear indicator of what stage any proposal is in, and also with properly-structured filtering to help users find the proposals they are interested in.