Closed effectfully closed 10 hours ago
/benchmark validation
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
/benchmark nofib
/benchmark lists
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '5eb80f3fe3' (base) and 'b0e2689080' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 44.57 ms | 43.83 ms | -1.7% |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
Comparing benchmark results of 'nofib' on '5eb80f3fe3' (base) and 'b0e2689080' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 1.240 s | 1.234 s | -0.5% |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
Comparing benchmark results of 'lists' on '5eb80f3fe3' (base) and 'b0e2689080' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 517.0 ms | 516.1 ms | -0.2% |
/benchmark validation
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '5eb80f3fe3' (base) and 'b0e2689080' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 44.53 ms | 43.67 ms | -1.9% |
/benchmark validation
/benchmark validation
/benchmark validation
/benchmark validation
/benchmark validation
/benchmark validation
/benchmark validation
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '5eb80f3fe3' (base) and 'b0e2689080' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 44.51 ms | 43.55 ms | -2.2% |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '5eb80f3fe3' (base) and 'b0e2689080' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 44.58 ms | 43.78 ms | -1.8% |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '5eb80f3fe3' (base) and 'b0e2689080' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 44.31 ms | 43.53 ms | -1.7% |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '5eb80f3fe3' (base) and 'b0e2689080' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 44.92 ms | 43.76 ms | -2.6% |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '5eb80f3fe3' (base) and 'b0e2689080' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 44.37 ms | 43.84 ms | -1.2% |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '5eb80f3fe3' (base) and 'b0e2689080' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 44.54 ms | 43.78 ms | -1.7% |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '5eb80f3fe3' (base) and 'b0e2689080' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 44.44 ms | 43.81 ms | -1.4% |
/benchmark validation
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '5eb80f3fe3' (base) and 'b0e2689080' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 44.56 ms | 43.84 ms | -1.6% |
/benchmark validation
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '5eb80f3fe3' (base) and 'b0e2689080' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 44.42 ms | 43.61 ms | -1.8% |
OK, these ones are great across all the runs:
So this is definitely an improvement and an extremely cheap one. Let's call it -1.8% on average (we got results from -1.2% to -2.6% with most being around -1.8%).
/benchmark validation
/benchmark no fib
/benchmark nofib
/benchmark lists
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation' on '5eb80f3fe' (base) and 'b0e268908' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 44.55 ms | 43.76 ms | -1.8% |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
Comparing benchmark results of 'nofib' on '5eb80f3fe' (base) and 'b0e268908' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 1.233 s | 1.228 s | -0.4% |
Click here to check the status of your benchmark.
Comparing benchmark results of 'lists' on '5eb80f3fe' (base) and 'b0e268908' (PR)
5eb80f3 | b0e2689 | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | 518.7 ms | 515.8 ms | -0.6% |
I used to see this:
and now I see this:
in the GHC Core of the
spend
local function inUntypedPlutusCore.Evaluation.Machine.Cek.ExBudgetMode
. It's a tiny but welcome improvement.