Closed foetus closed 12 years ago
This is i386? I believe this three failures are known bugs on all platforms. Would it make sense to disable these tests until they're fixed?
I'm working on an OpenBSD port for Io of you'd like to try it https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/lang/io
Disabled 1 and 2, fixed 3.
$ io ../libs/iovm/tests/correctness/run.io ....E..................E.............................................. ...................................................................... ...............................................E......................
................
FAIL: NumberTest testFunctions
Exception:
assertEquals(10, -(10 abs))
is a known bugException raise UnitTest.io 136 NumberTest fail UnitTest.io 191 NumberTest knownBug NumberTest.io 34 NumberTest testFunctions doString 1
FAIL: ObjectTest testWillFree
Exception:
Lobby willFreeWorked != true
-->false != true
Exception raise UnitTest.io 136 ObjectTest fail UnitTest.io 158 ObjectTest assertEquals ObjectTest.io 108 ObjectTest testWillFree doString 1
FAIL: SequenceTest testFileName
Exception:
"abc" != "abc" fileName
-->"abc" != nil
Exception raise UnitTest.io 136 SequenceTest fail UnitTest.io 158 SequenceTest assertEquals SequenceTest.io 459 SequenceTest testFileName doString 1
Ran 226 tests in 9.2757690000000004s
FAILED (failures 3)
PS. I had to comment the Socket add-on from the cmake file list it was preventing the build.