Open isabela-pf opened 2 years ago
In Task 3, participants were asked "If you were able to magically make accessing this section [File Information] easier, what would be the same? What would be different?" One participant specifically noted the way they like to navigate through content headings (ie. a new topic of discussion, the next step in a tutorial as denoted by HTML heading attributes) using the number keys 1–6, a heading navigation control on JAWS for Windows.
I need to verify if this was because the user could not complete this as-is and wanted to, or if it was a clarifying note that we should make sure to test when working on content heading navigation elements like a visible table of contents. Either way, the specificity of the feedback warranted an extra note.
Because this was a discussion about content headings, I am adding it to this issue. If we end up needing different fixes, let me know and I can move it elsewhere.
Problem and context
This issue comes from our user testing round 1: navigation. Several participants remarked upon the lack of visible table of contents at the top of the notebook. Based on the feedback, this sounds like a standard expectation (though one not always met) for these participants whenever they are navigating a document-focused interface. While this missing piece of UI did not prevent any participants from being able to complete their tasks, it was mentioned many times that the tasks' workflow would be improved with a table of contents.
This was requested most frequently for navigation, content summarization, and notebook metadata (ie. what info participants rely on to know they are in a notebook with “helpful” information for their task). Participants also mentioned that this becomes extra important the longer a page/document is.
The added table of contents needs the following qualities.
As a note, this was requested almost entirely by participants who did not use a screen reader during their session. Some participants who did use a screen reader during their session did request it. Of screen reader-using participants who did not request a visible table of contents, all of them used content heading navigation via their screen reader to complete at least one task (and some used it for all tasks).
Possible solutions
Acceptance criteria
This issue can be closed when we
Tasks to complete