Open IronBiscuit opened 3 years ago
The word "contains" is correctly used for UG, because what we mean is when user has the expense called A, with description: entertainment movie and he uses the command: filter-d entertainment, will list out the expense A. The reason is because description of expense A "contains" entertainment.
Perhaps, we have not specified well enough in UG that if the desciption of expense is separated by spacing, it will considered 2 kinds of keyword for DESCRIPTION. Our team accepted this issues with low severity
Team chose [severity.Low
]
Originally [severity.High
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your reason]
The image above is from the User Guide, section 3.10.3 Filter by description:
filter-d
, while the image below is from the Developer Guide, section 6.12 Filter by Description.In the UG case, the command is depicted to display expenses with descriptions that "contains" the keyword specified.
E.g "enter", "tainment", "entertain" are valid keywords for an "entertainment" description.
Whereas in the DG case, the command is depicted to display expenses with descriptions that "strictly matches" the keyword specified.
E.g "entertainment" is the only valid keyword for an "entertainment" description.
After using the application, it is apparent that the DG's description is the accurate one. Perhaps the UG could be editted a little to make the command description a little clearer.