Open DanielReverter opened 2 years ago
Hello Dani, here is my feedback:
In the readme you make a brief introduction to the project and explains a little both the organization of the repo and the hypothesis but could be improved by developing a little more the readme especially in the part of conclusions with images, more explanations etc... It is too schematic. In the notebooks the name does not correspond with the code that is executed inside it, besides the process is not explained, neither insights nor if it has something to do with the hypotheses raised beyond the comments in the code. This project could be improved.
https://github.com/DanielReverter/project-pandas.git