Hi,
my question upfront: Could the code be changed such that the Unifi node accepts an empty port field?
The details:
I don't know enough to propose a pull request. I have a UDM pro and for any Unifi-node I put into node-red, I don't need to specify a port; just the IP address is enough.
The problem is, that the node thinks it's missing the port and that for every deployment of changes I have to manually confirm that I want to deploy despite the "missing" info in the node.
Only 8843 will keep the node itself working, but its output (using the access-devices command) is empty. With any other port, its output is [object Object] below the node and no message is passed on.
Without a port set at all, it works as intended. The Unifi-OS box is checked on.
Hi, my question upfront: Could the code be changed such that the Unifi node accepts an empty port field?
The details: I don't know enough to propose a pull request. I have a UDM pro and for any Unifi-node I put into node-red, I don't need to specify a port; just the IP address is enough.
The problem is, that the node thinks it's missing the port and that for every deployment of changes I have to manually confirm that I want to deploy despite the "missing" info in the node.
I have tried all ports as mentioned here: UniFi - Ports Used
Only 8843 will keep the node itself working, but its output (using the access-devices command) is empty. With any other port, its output is
[object Object]
below the node and no message is passed on.Without a port set at all, it works as intended. The Unifi-OS box is checked on.
Thanks for considering!