Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
Original comment by roozbeh@google.com
on 24 Jul 2014 at 8:35
Replacing the previous screenshot with a more blurred version on personal name.
Original comment by ping...@google.com
on 24 Jul 2014 at 8:35
Attachments:
Original comment by roozbeh@google.com
on 25 Jul 2014 at 6:27
Original comment by roozbeh@google.com
on 25 Jul 2014 at 6:33
I want to get a claification on a couple of things:
- Are proportional shapes also desired for Traditional Chinese text? I
understand proportional shapes are desired for Western text, i.e., the "It's
good" case.
- If we do context aware shapes, i.e., proportional shapes for English and full
width shapes for T. Chinese in a Chinese-English mixed text, should we consider
both sides of the quotation marks, or only left side of the quotation mark?
Also, for S Chinese, full-width forms are preferred when used for S chinese
text and proportional forms are preferred for Western text. If we have a good
solution for the context aware shapping, we can also also apply that to S
Chinese (and maybe Japanese and Korean too).
Original comment by xian...@google.com
on 30 Jul 2014 at 12:08
Original comment by xian...@google.com
on 30 Jul 2014 at 12:08
The Japanese and Korean fonts and OTC font instances already use proportional
glyphs for these four characters, and additionally include CJK-optimized forms
(that are aligned to the em-box rather than to the Western cap height) which
are accessible via the 'locl' GSUB feature when the text is language-tagged to
a CJK one.
The ideal way to handle this is via the 'locl' GSUB feature, but the problem is
that only a small number of environments support it, and it also depends on the
user properly language-tagging the text. Another approach is the 'calt'
(contextual alternates) GSUB feature, but there are Western and Chinese use
cases that would break this.
In the end, I suspect that simply choosing a default and having some mechanism
for accessing the other forms, such as the 'pwid' and 'fwid' GSUB feature, is
the best overall approach.
Original comment by ken.lu...@gmail.com
on 30 Jul 2014 at 12:56
Issue 179 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by roozbeh@google.com
on 23 Oct 2014 at 4:50
Original comment by xian...@google.com
on 18 Feb 2015 at 7:44
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ping...@google.com
on 24 Jul 2014 at 8:33Attachments: