[x] Review current state incl. demo and discuss next steps
[x] Discuss the relevance of The Identity smart contract can ONLY be owned by a Gnosis Safe as the SDK checks for existing of Gnosis Web3 provider.
After discussion: This may not be possible to check 100% in smart contract if the caller is a "safe" (maybe gnosis does not implement erc165).. so if a user uses the smart contract SDK they can bypass the gnosis deploy step
[x] Discuss, if Gnosis is the way to go or maybe newer concepts like mpc (multi party computing from fireblocks e.g.) or DFNS (a company providing wallets as a service)
The Identity smart contract can ONLY be owned by a Gnosis Safe
as the SDK checks for existing of Gnosis Web3 provider. After discussion: This may not be possible to check 100% in smart contract if the caller is a "safe" (maybe gnosis does not implement erc165).. so if a user uses the smart contract SDK they can bypass the gnosis deploy step