search

JATS4R / JATS4R-Participant-Hub

The hub for all JATS4R meeting notes, examples, draft recommendations, documents, and issues.
http://jats4r.org
17 stars 20 forks source link

Different licenses for content and associated data #23

Closed Daniel-Mietchen closed 9 years ago

Daniel-Mietchen commented 10 years ago

Here is a case where different components are licensed differently. It is different from #8, so I am keeping it separate for the moment.

<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0">
    <license-p>
        This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</ext-link>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. 
        The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/</ext-link>) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
    </license-p>
</license>

As in #8, a 'multi-licence' tag may be the way to go here.

Klortho commented 10 years ago

Is it really different? Can you let us know exactly which article this came from?

The reason I ask is that is allowed in a lot of different places within the article (see the documentation page), for example, . So this licensing might be able to be tagged within the existing recommendations, but it would be good to verify that with the concrete example.

Melissa37 commented 9 years ago

We've got a case that is pretty similar to this, but put it in #8, and has been discussed briefly but probably not to the point of satisfaction!

Melissa37 commented 9 years ago

Too similar to #8 therefore closing.