read and summarise the overview papers

[JBGruber]

Through #9, we also identify other review articles. We should probably not simply include them in #14, but look at them separately. This should be done at least simultaneously, or even better before #14, so we can identify leanings for our own task,

[valeriehase]

Salamanca task description

This task has been buried a bit, so we haven't really talked much about it yet. Essentially, we need a plan of attack for the 27 papers that contain a literature review already. We identified those in the abstract annotation and there might be older work that we haven't identified yet. This would go into the related work section of the paper. Here is the list of papers we have identified so far: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qaw8VJDJh0QB5iKLVWL0Ktr8hfBecBfYnAFGJ2f2cQY/edit

[valeriehase]

Next steps:

• Mark N = 27 studies as relevant vs. irrrelevant
• Do for remaining papers Damian will identify as relevant based on full corpus
• Add forward-/backward check (references in papers, google scholar, etc.)
• Inform Johannes about measurements/variables drawn from lit review
• Write theory section