Closed PraveenKumar-NOAA closed 5 months ago
1215 | 115 - test_iodaconv_bufr_ncep_prepbufr_adpupa (Failed) 1216 | 116 - test_iodaconv_bufr_ncep_prepbufr_adpupa_api (Failed)
@PraveenKumar-NOAA I am not sure you can see the output from your ctests since cdash is failing at the moment:
The following tests FAILED: 1215 | 115 - test_iodaconv_bufr_ncep_prepbufr_adpupa (Failed) 1216 | 116 - test_iodaconv_bufr_ncep_prepbufr_adpupa_api (Failed)
@PatNichols thanks, I will check once HERA is up for work.
@PraveenKumar-NOAA I am not sure you can see the output from your ctests since cdash is failing at the moment:
The following tests FAILED: 1215 | 115 - test_iodaconv_bufr_ncep_prepbufr_adpupa (Failed) 1216 | 116 - test_iodaconv_bufr_ncep_prepbufr_adpupa_api (Failed)
@PatNichols thanks, I will check once HERA is up for work.
@PatNichols this problem is arising after I trimmed the input bufr file. Is it OK to proceed with the original ADPUPA.prepbufr file, which leads to the output NC file > 1 Mb?
@emilyhcliu @rmclaren please review this PR.
@PraveenKumar-NOAA is it possible to reduce the test file size?
@PraveenKumar-NOAA is it possible to reduce the test file size?
@PatNichols No, I tried to reduce the size for different capacity, but it didn't work. We have to keep the same size.
@PraveenKumar-NOAA is it possible to reduce the test file size?
@PatNichols No, I tried to reduce the size for different capacity, but it didn't work. We have to keep the same size.
@PraveenKumar-NOAA Does it fail the test with a smaller file or does the reduction fail to produce a usable file?
@PraveenKumar-NOAA is it possible to reduce the test file size?
@PatNichols No, I tried to reduce the size for different capacity, but it didn't work. We have to keep the same size.
@PraveenKumar-NOAA Does it fail the test with a smaller file or does the reduction fail to produce a usable file?
@PatNichols test is failed with a smaller file.
@PraveenKumar-NOAA is it possible to reduce the test file size?
@PatNichols No, I tried to reduce the size for different capacity, but it didn't work. We have to keep the same size.
@PraveenKumar-NOAA Does it fail the test with a smaller file or does the reduction fail to produce a usable file?
@PatNichols test is failed with a smaller file.
@PraveenKumar-NOAA Is it the case that reducing the netcdf file require the bufr file to be reduced and that is not easy?
@PraveenKumar-NOAA is it possible to reduce the test file size?
@PatNichols No, I tried to reduce the size for different capacity, but it didn't work. We have to keep the same size.
@PraveenKumar-NOAA Does it fail the test with a smaller file or does the reduction fail to produce a usable file?
@PatNichols test is failed with a smaller file.
@PraveenKumar-NOAA Is it the case that reducing the netcdf file require the bufr file to be reduced and that is not easy?
@PatNichols yes, that is true.
@PatNichols do you have any other question/ issue?
@PraveenKumar-NOAA We are just looking at the file sizes. I suppose it's not as big as an issue since you are removing on ~1.5 Mb and adding another. @fcvdb @BenjaminRuston What do you guys think?
Description
This PR updates dimension of variables into the adpupa prepbufr yaml and removes extra copies of the yaml/nc files for this data type.
The following two files were modified for the dimension updates:
The following two files were removed:
The following file is also modified to remove the unit test for the adpupa_prepbufr.yaml:
Dependencies
None
Impact
None