Hi there,
Thank you for developing such a useful and well-documented tool.
While processing my data, I have noticed inconsistencies in the transcriptional clustering.
Running this exact same block of code (adapted from the vignette) back-to-back on the same sample has resulted in several different figures, some with different numbers of clusters. See figures below.
I know the tSNE/UMAP plots are often vary slightly in their arrangement, but I haven't encountered a situation where the number of clusters change. Can you clarify if this is normal, or a bug, or something I'm missing/doing incorrectly? (I apologize in advance if this is an issue I should have opened in the Meringue GitHub.)
Hi there, Thank you for developing such a useful and well-documented tool.
While processing my data, I have noticed inconsistencies in the transcriptional clustering.
Running this exact same block of code (adapted from the vignette) back-to-back on the same sample has resulted in several different figures, some with different numbers of clusters. See figures below.
Various figures produced:
![Rplot1](https://github.com/JEFworks-Lab/STdeconvolve/assets/71400437/a3f49fb8-abf8-4684-8b8a-d241f6d8a89b)
I know the tSNE/UMAP plots are often vary slightly in their arrangement, but I haven't encountered a situation where the number of clusters change. Can you clarify if this is normal, or a bug, or something I'm missing/doing incorrectly? (I apologize in advance if this is an issue I should have opened in the Meringue GitHub.)
Thank you!