Closed JEK-III closed 10 years ago
Deleted:
In the absence of particular questions and conclusions, it is not obvious what peer review of data should certify. A dataset may serve for some purposes, but not for others\cite{parsons_data_2010}. A reviewer may anticipate some uses for the data, but not all. Researchers are already overwhelmed by peer review of articles\cite{diederich_are_2013} and may find any increased workload unreasonable. Despite all these difficulties, venues for peer-reviewed data papers are opening rapidly.
They overstate some difficulties of peer-review (No-one looks at every data value? No, they use statistics, visualization, and other techniques.) while not fully considering who is responsible for what. We need a closer examination of different roles and who are appropriate validators (not necessarily conventional peers).