Open cahartin opened 6 years ago
and a table of percent difference or percent decadal trend model | basin | absolute change (that would just be the difference from 1st table - maybe redundant) | trend min | trend max
@cahartin
@cahartin now the second set of tables values are the percent change in the labnotebook_tables (2).zip decadal slope
@cahartin okay so now I only have one set of tables that contains the percent change in the mean amplitude, min, and max for each variable / basin / model + multi model mean.
Consolidated percent change tables where the largest and smallest percent CMIP reflects the magnitude of the percent change .
So one problem with this table is that is that it sometimes fails to capture the spread of the CMIP models are increasing in percentage and decreasing in percentage just the magnitude of the percent change.
pH
variable | basin | model | mean_amplitude | mean_max | mean_min |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ph | N Atlantic | Smallest observed CMIP5 | 2.1 | 0.3 | -2.0 |
Largest observed CMIP5 | -32.7 | -33.5 | -51.8 | ||
Multi-Model Mean | -7.0 | -10.5 | 4.0 | ||
S Atlantic | Smallest observed CMIP5 | 1.0 | 3.0 | -1.2 | |
Largest observed CMIP5 | -49.2 | -51.1 | 47.7 | ||
Multi-Model Mean | -12.1 | -15.3 | 8.8 | ||
N Pacific | Smallest observed CMIP5 | -2.5 | 0.9 | -0.8 | |
Largest observed CMIP5 | 31.4 | -24.2 | -38.4 | ||
Multi-Model Mean | -2.5 | -6.6 | -0.8 | ||
S Pacific | Smallest observed CMIP5 | -1.9 | -3.9 | -3.5 | |
Largest observed CMIP5 | -50.6 | -47.3 | 53.1 | ||
Multi-Model Mean | -15.6 | -14.4 | 16.8 |
spCO2
variable | basin | model | mean_amplitude | mean_max | mean_min |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
spco2 | N Atlantic | Smallest observed CMIP5 | 86.4 | 99.0 | -76.3 |
Largest observed CMIP5 | 205.6 | 497.8 | -195.4 | ||
Multi-Model Mean | 171.8 | 182.9 | -158.3 | ||
S Atlantic | Smallest observed CMIP5 | 69.2 | 73.6 | -63.1 | |
Largest observed CMIP5 | 250.2 | 503.0 | -211.2 | ||
Multi-Model Mean | 141.3 | 167.4 | -114.4 | ||
N Pacific | Smallest observed CMIP5 | 131.7 | 132.6 | -57.2 | |
Largest observed CMIP5 | 357.1 | 385.0 | -321.7 | ||
Multi-Model Mean | 190.6 | 210.9 | -166.1 | ||
S Pacific | Smallest observed CMIP5 | 56.5 | 53.4 | -60.8 | |
Largest observed CMIP5 | 173.6 | 216.2 | -149.1 | ||
Multi-Model Mean | 130.7 | 139.5 | -121.7 |
If we are interested in capturing the full spread, both direction (increase and decrease) as well as magnitude we may want to visualize this information in a box plot....
An alternative to presenting the percent change information in a table is a boxplot that illustrates the CMIP spread in the magnitude of the percent change and the direction. This really only applies to pH where models are inconsistent if the seasonal stat increases or decreases in the future.
Those look cool. thanks for thinking of that!
for each variable model | basin | hist ampl | future ampl