search

JGCRI / gcam-core

GCAM -- The Global Change Analysis Model
http://jgcri.github.io/gcam-doc/
Other
263 stars 159 forks source link

Sectoral policies #347

Closed Kofimoley closed 8 months ago

Kofimoley commented 9 months ago

Hi fellow GCAMers, I am curious to know if it is possible to model a zero or near zero pathway for a particular sector of the economy (example transport) instead of the conventional approach where the net zero pathway is for a region or global. Typically, based on the region or global net zero pathway modelling, one can tell the economy-wide transformations needed to achieve the pathway. However, what if we were interested in knowing just how a particular sector should transition from its current technologies and fuels in order to reach carbon neutrality by that sector (example, assuming one wanted to study the required transformations for a zero or near zero or net zero shipping industry by mid-century, and how such an ambition would affect other sectors of the economy such as power, industry, and so on). I have attempted doing this on my own but to no avail. I was hoping to get some guidelines from the contributors and/or users who may have successfully attempted this previously. Would be very happy to get some feedbacks. Thank you. @bpbond @pkyle @zarrarkhan @pralitp @kvcalvin @d3y419 @crvernon

pkyle commented 8 months ago

There are a few ways to make sector- or technology-specific policies; the one I've used before is to assign a separate CO2 object to the technologies of interest, in all years. For example, in shipping, you'd want to make an XML file with the following structure: `

` Of course copy that through to all years, for all technologies that you want. The CO2 emitted by the technology will be added to the CO2_transport market, which can then be constrained just as with any other market. The unit is Mt C (i.e., Mt CO2 times 12/44). Examples of the policy structure are in the committed input/policy folder. ` tax USA 350 `
Kofimoley commented 8 months ago

Thank you very much, @pkyle. The suggested approach worked perfectly, and I was able to implement a policy specifically for the transport sector. I will go ahead and close the issue now. However, I would like to mention that for anyone attempting this in the future, it's important to note that following this approach would result in double-counting of CO2 emissions from the sector. Nevertheless, the policy still functions as intended.